Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
K.LAKSHMAN
Bandari Laxmaiah Laxmaiah – Appellant
Versus
Chelloju Ramanachari – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. ownership and possession of the agricultural land. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. contentions regarding the sale deed executed during pendency. (Para 8 , 10) |
| 3. legal basis for impleading parties in the suit. (Para 15 , 21) |
| 4. transfer of property during litigation is subject to court's order. (Para 22 , 23 , 26) |
| 5. dismissal of the revision petition. (Para 37) |
ORDER :
K. LAKSHMAN, J.
Heard Sri M.Kiran Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Ramchander Rao Vemuganti, learned counsel appearing for respondents.
2. The present Civil Revision Petition is filed challenging the order dated 28.02.2025 passed in I.A.No.1098 of 2024 in O.S.No.78 of 2020 by the Principal Junior Civil Judge – cum – Judicial Magistrate of First Class at Karimnagar.
3. The petitioner herein/plaintiff filed the aforesaid suit against the respondents 2 to 4 herein/defendants 1 to 3/D.1 to D.3 to declare him as title holder, owners and possessor of the suit schedule agricultural land (for short, ‘the subject property’) and for perpetual injunction restraining D.1 to D.3 from interfering with the suit schedule property; to declare the sale certificate, dated 06.09.2005 as not a title deed of D.1; to declar
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
