Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
N. TUKARAMJI
V. Pranav Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ of mandamus against refusal to act. (Para 1 , 3) |
| 2. petitioner claims police inaction on social boycott. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. allegations of boycott deemed unfounded. (Para 6) |
| 4. police acted on petitioner's representation. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 5. social boycotts violate fundamental rights. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 6. writ petition disposed, liberty maintained for future. (Para 13 , 14) |
ORDER :
1. This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India seeking the following relief:
“…issue a writ or order or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus under Article 226 of Constitution of India declaring the actions of Respondent No 1 to 8 to not taking any action against the Respondents No 9 to 25 and for imposing social boycott against the petitioner and his family which are totally illegal arbitrary against the principles of Natural Justice and the same is against the provisions of the Article 14 17 and 21 of the Constitution of India and issue a appropriate direction for the enforcement of the fundamental right guaranteed under Article 14 17 and 21 of the Constitution of India and to lift the social boycott of the petitioner and his family and to p
Social boycotts are unconstitutional and violate fundamental rights, but the court lacks jurisdiction to mandate police action on private matters unless rights are threatened.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
