Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
K.LAKSHMAN
Birla Mallesh – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts regarding petitioner's claim on land ownership. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. court's interim order on land classification. (Para 6 , 12) |
| 3. issues of non-consideration of representations. (Para 7 , 8 , 11 , 13) |
| 4. court's decision on the writ petition regarding service proof. (Para 9 , 10 , 14) |
ORDER :
1. Heard Sri Mohd. M.A.Ashwak, learned counsel representing Sri Meer Akbar Ali Hashmi, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri T. Rajinikanth Reddy, learned Additional Advocate General appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 3, Sri L.Ravinder, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, appearing for respondent Nos.4 to 7, Sri D.Narender Naik, learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondent No.8 and Sri Vadeendra Joshi, learned counsel appearing for respondent Nos.9 to 12.
2. This writ petition is filed to declare the action of respondent Nos.6 and 7 in not considering the representation dated 09.05.2025 submitted by the petitioner seeking copies of mutation proceedings, issuance of pattadar passbooks etc. in respect of land in Sy.No.194 of Nagaram Village, Maheshwaram Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, under the provisions of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 the Bharatiya Sa
The dismissal of the writ petition due to non-provision of proof of service on respondents highlights procedural requirements under the law.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
