Back
2025 Supreme(Telangana) 1907
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
E.V. VENUGOPAL, J.
Smt. Pakala Chokkamma – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
Writ Petition Nos.30448 and 30469 of 2025
Decided On : 08-10-2025
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : NYAYA MITHRA LAW FIRM ABHINAV MAHENDER REDDY KANDADI
For the Respondent: OR REVENUE
The court affirms that ongoing civil disputes preclude immediate action under the challenged petitions regarding property mutability and senior citizen protections.
Headnote:The writ petitions seek relief against the inaction of respondents regarding complaints by the petitioner concerning property rights and the welfare of senior citizens. The court finds civil disputes are pending and directs the respondents to consider the petitions in light of relevant laws. The petitioners are advised to approach the District Collector for proper orders. The petitions are ultimately disposed of with no costs.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners seek legal remedy for property rights. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. details of property ownership and past judicial orders. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. complaint about illegal actions affecting property rights. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. government's stance on ongoing civil litigation. (Para 8) |
| 5. court's opinion on action and jurisdiction of respondents. (Para 9) |
| 6. final direction on disposal of petitions. (Para 10) |
ORDER :
E.V. VENUGOPAL, J.
These Writ Petitions, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, are filed seeking the following relief:
W.P.No.30448 of 2025
“…to issue to Writ Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of 2nd to 6th Respondents in considering the Petitioner complaint dated 24.08.2025 to take action against the against illegal acts of ill treatment made by the 7th to 10th Respondents attempts to grab the petitioner property by creating legal hurdles on her Husband share property in respect of Sy.No.112 (0.06 gts), Sy.No.113 (2.05 gts) and H.No.4-78(4-91) and Cattle Shed, situated at Annaram Village Manakondur Mandal Karimnagar District bequeathed under Will Deed No.25/2017 to deprive petitioner being senior citizen and endangering her life liberty and property as illegal arbitrary and violative of Articles 14, 21 and 300A of the Constitution of India and to direct the 2nd Respondent-District Collector Karimnagar to consider the petitioner application dated 24.08.2025 and Prajavani application dated 04.08.2025 initiate proceedings under Section 23 of the Act read with Rule 21(3) of the Telangana Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Rules, 2011 as amended for protection of Senior Citizens rights and title over her property from making ill treatment by creating legal hurdles on her Husband share property and interference of 7th to 10th Respondent in accordance with law under Section 23 of the Act read with Rule 21(3) of the Telangana Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Rules, 2011 as amended and pass...”
W.P.No.30469 of 2025
“…pleased to issue to Writ Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of 2nd and 4th Respondents in considering the Petitioner application dated 24/08/2025 and Prajavani application dated 04/08/2025 before the 2nd Respondent as an appeal under section 152 of Telangana Bhu Bharathi ROR in Land Act, 2025 against the order of 3rd Respondent-RDO Karimnagar vide Endorsement Ref.No.D1/ 387/2025, dated 29/07/2025 refusing mutation of properties in Sy.No.112 (0.06 gts) Sy.No.113 (2.05 gts) and H.No.4-78(4-91) and Cattle Shed situated at Annaram Village Manakondur Mandal Karimnagar District in favour of 2nd Petitioner bequeathed under Will Deed No.25/2017 to deprive petitioners life liberty and property as illegal arbitrary and violative of Articles 14, 21 and 300A of the Constitution of India and to direct the 2nd Respondent District Collector Karimnagar to consider the petitioners application dated 24.08.2025 and Prajavani application dated 04.08.2025 as an appeal under section 15(2) of Telangana Bhu Bharathi ROR in Land Act 2025 against the order of 3rd Respondent RDO Karimnagar vide Endorsement Ref.No.D1/387/ 2025, dated 29.07.2025 in accordance with law and pass...”
2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, for respondent Nos.1 to 4 and perused the record.
3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that the husband of petitioner No.1 late Sri Pakala Ramana Reddy, during his lifetime had partitioned the joint family properties, into 4 shares and executed 3 registered gift deeds in favour the children of petitioner No.1 (i.e., Petitioner No.2 herein and respondent Nos.7 to 9 herein). The husband of petitioner No.1 retained his share of the property as absolute ownership, including land to an extent of Ac.0.06 guntas in Sy.Nos.112 and Acs.2.05 guntas in Sy.No.113 and Hous
