Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
R. Prashanth Rao – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Health, Medical & Family Welfare Department – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. allegations against the petitioner lack factual basis. (Para 2) |
| 2. respondent's authority and procedural compliance are contested. (Para 4) |
| 3. court suggests submission of representation to the respondent. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. writ petition disposed; representation is to be considered. (Para 8 , 9) |
ORDER :
Nagesh Bheemapaka, J.
This Writ Petition is filed challenging Notice No. TSMC/L&DAQ/Ethics/42/A/2025 dated 29-01-2025 whereby petitioner was directed to appear before the Ethics Panel of the Telangana State Medical Council.
2. Petitioner’s case is that he had been serving as the Medical Director of Respondent No.3, i.e. Wellness NXP Private Limited, which is a duly registered clinical establishment forming part of a chain of six Wellness Hospitals which are operating in the State of Telangana. According to petitioner, he was responsible for overseeing the clinical functions of the institution, however, he tendered resignation from the said post on 1st July, 2024. While so, the 2nd respondent issued notice on 21.03.2024 addressing the Medical Superintendent of the Hospital in which allegations were levelled that hospital had sponsored and participated in felicitation progra
The authority to regulate clinical establishments lies exclusively with the designated authority under the Clinical Establishments Act, rendering actions by others unauthorized and the allegations ag....
The notice issued for disciplinary action against a medical practitioner must comply with mandatory procedural requirements, failing which it is considered void and unenforceable.
The court upheld the lawful seizure of a hospital due to unauthorized medical practices, affirming compliance with statutory procedures and the protection of public health.
The suspension of a medical practitioner's license was quashed due to violation of natural justice and lack of jurisdiction in enforcing external regulations.
The court mandated strict compliance with the Clinical Establishments Act, emphasizing that non-enforcement leads to public health concerns, while personal grievances must be pursued through proper l....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
