Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY
Nalla Bhaskar Reddy – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. ownership and possession of agricultural land (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. dispute over alleged sale deed authenticity (Para 6 , 7) |
| 3. counterarguments regarding validation of sale deed (Para 8 , 9) |
| 4. issue of sale deed versus agreement of sale (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 5. court's final ruling on land claim (Para 16 , 17) |
ORDER :
LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY, J.
This Writ Petition is filed to declare the Order dated 06.07.2020 in file No.F2/4502/2017 of respondent No.2, whereby revision petition filed by the petitioner was dismissed as illegal, unlawful and contrary to the provisions of Telangana State Rights in Lands and Pattadar Passbook Act, 1971 and for consequential relief.
2. Heard Sri J.Kanakaiah, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue and Sri K.Lakshmi Manoher, learned Counsel for respondent No.5.
3. Brief facts of the case as averred in the writ petition are that petitioner’s mother late Nalla Suvarnamma, was the absolute owner and possessor of agricultural land admeasuring Acs.3 – 25 gts in Sy.No.265/U, Ac.1 – 03 gts in Sy.No.266/EE, Ac.0 – 23 gts in Sy.No.267/U, Acs.0 – 25 gts in Sy.No.268/U and Ac.0 – 07 gts in Sy.No.269
Agreements of sale cannot be treated as valid sale deeds under the Andhra Pradesh Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, preventing their regularization.
The court emphasized that appeals filed beyond statutory limitation periods cannot be entertained, reaffirming the importance of adherence to procedural timelines in resolving land disputes.
The main legal point established is that the absence of permission and validation under the A.P. (T.A.) Tenancy and Agriculture Land Act 1950 renders a sale transaction void and unlawful.
Administrative authorities cannot regularize disputed transactions under Section 5-A of the ROR Act; such matters must be resolved by civil courts.
A sale deed obtained through fraud is voidable but must be challenged in civil court; revenue authorities acted correctly in denying mutation based on existing claims.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
