SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Pat) 1424

RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA
Krishna Kumar Sinha – Appellant
Versus
Vipendra Paswan @ Biththal Paswan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Mr. Jitendra Kishore Verma.
For the Respondents: Mr. Ashok Kumar Sinha No.3.

ORDER

Heard learned counsel on behalf of the petitioner and learned counsel for plaintiffs/respondents 1st set.

2. The present civil revision is directed against the order dated 04.04.2017 passed by learned court of subjudge III, Gaya in Title Suit Case No. 75 of 2016/569 of 2016, whereby and whereunder, the petition of some of the petitioners/defendants under Order VII, Rule XI of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (hereinafter CPC) for rejection of the plaint has been rejected holding thereby that on the basis of the pleadings and the documents which form the basis of the plaint, it cannot be said that the plaint can be rejected at the initial stage itself and the fact of knowledge of the plaintiff regarding the execution of the sale deed is to be decided in the course of trial.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner in the instant case submitted that the learned trial court committed illegality in refusing the application for rejection of plaint under Order VII, Rule XI of the CPC, and therefore, the impugned order is illegal, improper and against the mandatory provisions of law and is liable to be set aside. The learned trial court failed to appreciate the fact that the plaintiffs/resp

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top