SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Telangana) 204

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO
Mohd. Alimuddin – Appellant
Versus
Feroz – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : V ATCHUTA RAM

Table of Content
1. details of the case and parties involved (Para 1 , 2)

JUDGMENT :

B.R. MADHUSUDHAN RAO, J.

1. This memorandum of Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (for short ‘MV Act’) assailing the award passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal - cum - XI Additional District Judge, (Fast Track Court), Ranga Reddy District (for short ‘the Tribunal’) in O.P.No.609 of2010 dated 24.01.2014.

2. Appellant herein is the petitioner and respondents herein are the respondents before the Tribunal.

3. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that respondent No.1 remained ex-parte before the Tribunal, hence he is not a necessary party in the appeal.

4.1 Appellant – petitioner has filed claim petition under Sections 140(c) and 166 of the MV Act read with Rules 475/1B of APMV Rules, 1989, claiming compensation of Rs.10,00,000/- with interest at the rate of 12% per annum from the date of filing the petition till the realization of the claim for the injuries sustained by him in the accident.

4.2 On 30.03.2010 at about 05.30 a.m., the driver of the lorry bearing No.MH-25B-9865 parked his lorry in the middle of the road without taking any precautio

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top