Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
J.SREENIVAS RAO
Mellacheruvu Aruna Kumari – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
ORDER :
1. This Criminal Petition has been filed seeking to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.803 of 2021 on the file of III Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate at Khammam, wherein the petitioners were arrayed as accused No.1 and 2 for the offences punishable under Sections 447, 427, 506 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code (for short ‘IPC’).
2. Brief Facts of the case:
2.1. Respondent No.2/de-facto complainant filed a complaint wherein it is stated that he has Ac.4.05 cents of agricultural land in Survey No.349/A/1, situated within the limits of Raghunadhapalem revenue village; on 08.02.2019, in the morning hours at about 9:00 A.M., Mellacheruvu Aruna Kumari W/o Venkatramaiah and Miriyala Radhalatha, the petitioners herein, along with some others, came to his land and damaged the flake shed which was arranged for buffaloes. At that time, watchman Boda Venkati tried to stop them, but they threatened to kill him, and the same was informed to him by the watchman. This land dispute was pending in S.A. No.1273/2017 and I.A. No.2 of 2018 in W.P. No.46288 of 2018. Even then, the above-said two persons, along with some others, stated that the land belonged to them and trespassed into t
Criminal proceedings should not continue when allegations pertain to civil disputes, as they can constitute an abuse of the legal process under Section 482 of Cr.P.C.
The existence of civil proceedings does not preclude criminal prosecution when allegations disclose cognizable offences, affirming the concurrent nature of civil and criminal jurisdictions.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
