Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY
Hotel Ekasila, Warangal, Reptd. by its Managing Partner Sri Rama Upendram – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana, reptd. by Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration, Hyderabad – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ petition aimed at challenging proceedings. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. petitioner's contention on partnership dissolution. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. respondent's defense against petitioner's claims. (Para 6 , 7 , 9) |
| 4. court's observations on partnership documentation. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 18) |
| 5. court holds that proceedings were erroneous. (Para 19) |
| 6. writ petition allowed; proceedings set aside. (Para 20 , 21) |
ORDER :
This Writ Petition is filed to issue a Writ of Mandamus declaring the proceedings No.A2/30553/2014, dated 08.01.2015, issued by respondent No.2 as unsustainable and unjust, and consequently, to set aside the same.
2. By the impugned proceedings, the earlier mutation proceedings dated 14.05.2008, effected in favour of petitioner, represented by its partners R.Upendram and four others, was cancelled and the entries that stood up to the year 2008 in the name of ‘Hotel Ekasila’ was restored.
3. Heard Sri Vedula Venkatramana, learned senior counsel appearing for Sri Pottigari Sridhar Reddy, learned counsel-on- record for petitioner, Sri Pasham Mohith, learned Standing Counsel for respondent No.2 and Sri M.Avinash Reddy, learned counsel for respondent Nos.4
Court clarified validity of partnership dissolution and subsequent registrations, emphasizing the necessity of considering all relevant documents in property ownership disputes.
Partners cannot unregister without due process; rights remain unless valid documents executed under the Indian Partnership Act.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the dissolution of a partnership firm under the Indian Partnership Act, 1932, and the reconstitution of the firm are governed by specific prov....
The liability of partners in a firm remains joint and several, and cannot be extinguished merely by a change in partnership.
In case of any dispute arising out of such a contract same is not to be agitated in a writ petition instituted under Article 226 of Constitution of India and same can only be agitated in a civil cour....
The death of a partner in a partnership firm does not cause abatement of appeals against the firm under Order XXX of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Point of law: No suit to enforce a right arising from a contract shall be instituted in any Court by or on behalf of a firm against any third party unless the firm is registered and the persons suing....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
