Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO
Rathod Nandu, S/o. Late Rathod Babaiah – Appellant
Versus
Rathod Narsing Rao, S/o. Late Rathod Babaiah – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
B.R. Madhusudhan Rao, J.
1. This Memorandum of First Appeal is filed under Section 96 r/w Order 43 Rule 1 of CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE , 1908 (for short ‘CPC’) assailing the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.383 of 2012, dated 07.10.2015 by the III Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court at Secunderabad, wherein the suit filed by the respondent-plaintiff for eviction and damages is partly decreed.
2. Appellant is the defendant and respondent is the plaintiff in OS. No.383 of 2012.
3.1. Respondent-plaintiff has filed suit for eviction and for damages @ Rs.3,000/- per month from August, 2011 against the appellant-defendant in respect of House bearing No.10-5-391 admeasuring 72 Square yrds out of 144 Square yrds, Street No.15, Sai Nagar near Indira Gandhi Statue, Tukaramgate, Secunderabad falling in Sy.No.844/13 P, T.S.No.33, Block No.1, Ward No.132 of Malkajgiri Village of Maredpally Mandal, Hyderabad District with boundaries.
3.2. It is stated in the plaint that respondent-plaintiff is the owner of the suit schedule property and he acquired the same from Government of A.P. under Registered Deed under Conveyance dated 28.01.2010 with document No.158 of 2010. He has constructed a h
The court ruled that insufficient evidence existed to establish property ownership, determining the trial court erred in adjudicating the plaintiff's claim based on fraudulent documentation.
Point of law: The principle of lis pendens is still settled principle of law. In this connection, the Full Bench of the Allahabad High Court in Ram Peary, AIR 1978 All 318] has considered the scope o....
Ownership claims require clear evidence, and adverse possession is incompatible with claims of title, as established in this case.
The need for a fair consideration of evidence and the requirement for the Government to disclose crucial evidence in land dispute cases.
Boundaries specified in a sale deed prevail over measurements when determining property ownership.
Point of law: A question of law having a material bearing on the decision of the case (that is, a question, answer to which affects the rights of parties to the suit) will be a substantial question o....
Ownership of immovable property must be established through valid title documents; revenue records alone do not confer ownership rights.
Ownership established through documentary evidence; defendant failed to prove lawful possession or title, justifying eviction.
A plaint cannot be rejected based on the defendants' defenses; only the plaint and accompanying documents should be considered.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
