Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA, ARUN KUMAR
State of U.P. – Appellant
Versus
Ramesh Kumar Singh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. claims for recurring grants by primary schools. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. state policy on grant-in-aid to private schools. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 3. history of attempts by institutions for aid. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 4. points for consideration in appeals. (Para 28) |
| 5. fundamental right to education under article 21-a. (Para 29 , 30 , 31 , 32) |
| 6. responsibilities under the rte act. (Para 33 , 34 , 35) |
| 7. state's obligation versus aid claims. (Para 36 , 38) |
| 8. conditions and qualifications for grant-in-aid. (Para 40 , 44 , 47) |
| 9. conclusion on recurring grants and appointments. (Para 49 , 51) |
Judgment :
Arun Kumar, J.
1. Heard Sri Anoop Trivedi, Learned Additional Advocate General, assisted by Sri Tej Bhanu Pandey, Learned Standing Counsel, for the Appellants Sri Rajesh Kumar Singh and Sri Vivek Kumar Singh for the respondents.
2. SPLA No.213 of 2025, SPLA No.214 of 2014, SPLAD No.4 of 2025, SPLAD No.7 of 2025 and SPLA D No.9 of 2024, arises out of Writ-A No.1659 of 2020, Writ-A No.15455 of 2019, Writ-A No.10873 of 2021, Writ-A No.10962 of 2021 and Writ-A No.3215 of 2021, respectively.
BRIEF FACTS
3. Writ-A No.1659 of 2020, Writ-A No.10962 of 2021 and Writ-A No.3215 o
The obligation of the State to provide free education under Article 21A does not create an automatic right for private institutions to receive recurring grants from the government.
The Right to free education does not confer entitlement to recurring aid for all private primary schools; compliance with legal requirements is essential for salary claims against the State.
The State is obligated to provide salaries to primary section teachers in recognized Sanskrit institutions as these sections are integral to educational obligations under constitutional mandates for ....
The court affirmed the right to maintenance grant for the primary section of an institution, emphasizing its integral relationship with the main institution under the Act of 1971.
The court established that an institution's right to grant-in-aid crystallizes under earlier government orders, and arbitrary denial based on newer policies violates constitutional rights.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the discriminatory refusal of financial approval by the State Government, in violation of Article 14 of the Constitution of India, despite admin....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the State Government complied with the court's order to revisit and reframe the policy, and the applicants did not qualify the test of composi....
Recognition and financial aid for educational institutions must align with equitable staff employment and ensure compliance with established legal conditions for staff remuneration.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
