SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(All) 1243

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
J.J. MUNIR, J.
Amit Kumar Singh and others – Appellants
Versus
State of U.P. and others - Respondents
Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 67056 of 2014
Decided on : 06-06-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Santosh Kumar Singh
For the Respondent: Girijesh Kumar Tripathi, Addl.C.S.C.

The State is obligated to provide salaries to primary section teachers in recognized Sanskrit institutions as these sections are integral to educational obligations under constitutional mandates for free education.

Headnote:(A) Uttar Pradesh Junior High School (Payment of Salaries of Teachers and Other Employees) Act, 1978 - Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution - The court addressed the issue of salary entitlements for primary section teachers in Sanskrit Institutions, asserting that the primary section is integral to the institution. The State's failure to pay salaries in accord with prior mandamus orders, particularly those laid out in Ramesh Upadhya and Pawan Kumar Divedi cases, was seen as discriminatory and arbitrary. The court emphasized that the primary section fulfills vital educational obligations under constitutional mandates for free education. It held that the State is obligated to extend grant-in-aid to primary teachers in Sanskrit institutions tied to higher educational institutions receiving such aid. (Paras 5, 6, 30, 32, 50-52)

Facts of the case:
Petitioners are teachers in the primary section of a recognized Sanskrit Mahavidyalaya, seeking payment of salaries covered by State grants, citing past judicial directives mandating such payments. (Paras 2, 5)

Findings of Court:
The court ruled that the primary section teachers must be compensated in alignment with those teaching higher classes, recognizing their integral role in education, and ordered adherence to previous judicial mandates. (Paras 4, 43)

Issues: The main issues involved whether primary section teachers in Sanskrit institutions are entitled to salaries borne on State grants and the implications of earlier judicial decisions.

Ratio Decidendi: The court clarified that the constitutional obligation to provide free education extends to the primary levels across all educational institutions, including Sanskrit Vidyalayas and their teachers; hence, State grant applicability must include the primary sections. The failure to adequately fund and compensate represents a constitutional violation of equality and educational rights.

Result: The court quashed the impugned order and mandated that the State implement previous judicial directives regarding salary payment to primary section teachers. (Paras 44, 52)

Table of Content
1. discussion on status and grants of the institution. (Para 1 , 2)
2. claim for salary as part of governmental responsibility. (Para 3 , 5)
3. court referral and past rulings regarding salary payments. (Para 4 , 6 , 12 , 14)
4. court observations on the self-contained nature of primary education. (Para 7 , 10 , 15)
5. discussions on legal framing of education grants. (Para 8 , 11 , 13)
6. state's obligation for funding in education extends to all institutions. (Para 9)
7. judicial precedents establish the funding rights of sanskrit school teachers. (Para 16 , 17 , 18)
8. final adjudication on obligations under state and education laws. (Para 19 , 22)
9. legal interpretations revolve around the equality of educational funding. (Para 20 , 21)
10. the decision reaffirms integral status and funding for primary sections. (Para 23 , 24)
11. the final judgment mandates funding provisions be upheld for education equity. (Para 25 , 26 , 27)

JUDGMENT :

Hon'ble J.J. Munir, J.-The petitioners, who are teachers in the primary section of the Sri Dayanand Sanskrit Mahavidyalay, Ganeshpur, Maniar, Ballia, pray that a mandamus be issued commanding the respondents to pay their monthly salary in the regular grade, borne on State grant, with effect from the date of their respective appointments. They also pray that a command be issued to the respondents to pay them arrears of salary from the date of their appointment, including consequential benefits.

2. The Sri Dayanand Sanskrit Mahavidyalay, Ganeshpur, Maniar, Ballia (for short, 'the Institution') is a recognized and aided institution, that is managed by a registered society, to wit, the Sri Dayanand Sanskrit Mahavidyalay, Ganeshpur, Maniar, Ballia (for short, 'the Society'). The Institution imparts education in their primary section i.e. Classes I to V, as well as the Prathama i.e. Junior High School, the Purva Madhyama equivalent to High School in the modern system of education and the Uttar Madhyama, equivalent to Intermediate Education in the mainstream system. This apart, the Institution also has the Shastri Section, which is equivalent to Graduation in conventional education. All teachers, teaching in the Institution across various levels from Prathama and Purva Madhyama to Uttar Madhyama, that is to say, Junior High School to the Intermediate level, are paid salaries borne on State funds. The teachers of the primary section of the Institution are not paid salaries borne on State grant. They are paid by the Management out of their own resources.

3. The petitioners say that the primary section is an integral part of the Institution and managed by the same Committee of Management. There is absolutely no distinction regarding administrative control over the teaching staff in the primary section of the Institution and those in the Junior High School, High School and Intermediate levels. To prove that the primary section is an integral part of the Institution, the petitioners have placed on record a certificate dated 17.6.1981 issued by the Inspector, Sanskrit Pathshala. The case of the petitioners goes that in the year 1989, the State Government considered the provision of maintenance grant to fund salaries for teachers in the attached primary sections of conventional higher secondary institutions, where the primary section was recognized prior to the year 1973. A Government Order dated 6.9.1989 was issued, notifying a list of 393 institutions in the conventional system of education, whose attached primary sections were brought on Government grant-in-aid. The petitioners then say that a letter dated 5.3.1991 was issued by the Director of Education addressed to the Inspector, Sanskrit Pathshala, seeking information regarding attached primary sections of Sanskrit Schools, so that these could be considered by the Government for the purpose of extension of grant-in-aid to fund salaries of their teachers.

4. The matter, though in the notice of the State Government, did not receive attention, on

              Click Here to Read the rest of this document
              1
              2
              3
              4
              5
              6
              7
              8
              9
              10
              11
              SupremeToday Portrait Ad
              supreme today icon
              logo-black

              An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

              Please visit our Training & Support
              Center or Contact Us for assistance

              qr

              Scan Me!

              India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

              For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

              whatsapp-icon Back to top