IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
J.J. MUNIR, J.
Amit Kumar Singh and others – Appellants
Versus
State of U.P. and others - Respondents
Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 67056 of 2014
Decided on : 06-06-2024
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. discussion on status and grants of the institution. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. claim for salary as part of governmental responsibility. (Para 3 , 5) |
| 3. court referral and past rulings regarding salary payments. (Para 4 , 6 , 12 , 14) |
| 4. court observations on the self-contained nature of primary education. (Para 7 , 10 , 15) |
| 5. discussions on legal framing of education grants. (Para 8 , 11 , 13) |
| 6. state's obligation for funding in education extends to all institutions. (Para 9) |
| 7. judicial precedents establish the funding rights of sanskrit school teachers. (Para 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 8. final adjudication on obligations under state and education laws. (Para 19 , 22) |
| 9. legal interpretations revolve around the equality of educational funding. (Para 20 , 21) |
| 10. the decision reaffirms integral status and funding for primary sections. (Para 23 , 24) |
| 11. the final judgment mandates funding provisions be upheld for education equity. (Para 25 , 26 , 27) |
JUDGMENT :
Hon'ble J.J. Munir, J.-The petitioners, who are teachers in the primary section of the Sri Dayanand Sanskrit Mahavidyalay, Ganeshpur, Maniar, Ballia, pray that a mandamus be issued commanding the respondents to pay their monthly salary in the regular grade, borne on State grant, with effect from the date of their respective appointments. They also pray that a command be issued to the respondents to pay them arrears of salary from the date of their appointment, including consequential benefits.
2. The Sri Dayanand Sanskrit Mahavidyalay, Ganeshpur, Maniar, Ballia (for short, 'the Institution') is a recognized and aided institution, that is managed by a registered society, to wit, the Sri Dayanand Sanskrit Mahavidyalay, Ganeshpur, Maniar, Ballia (for short, 'the Society'). The Institution imparts education in their primary section i.e. Classes I to V, as well as the Prathama i.e. Junior High School, the Purva Madhyama equivalent to High School in the modern system of education and the Uttar Madhyama, equivalent to Intermediate Education in the mainstream system. This apart, the Institution also has the Shastri Section, which is equivalent to Graduation in conventional education. All teachers, teaching in the Institution across various levels from Prathama and Purva Madhyama to Uttar Madhyama, that is to say, Junior High School to the Intermediate level, are paid salaries borne on State funds. The teachers of the primary section of the Institution are not paid salaries borne on State grant. They are paid by the Management out of their own resources.
3. The petitioners say that the primary section is an integral part of the Institution and managed by the same Committee of Management. There is absolutely no distinction regarding administrative control over the teaching staff in the primary section of the Institution and those in the Junior High School, High School and Intermediate levels. To prove that the primary section is an integral part of the Institution, the petitioners have placed on record a certificate dated 17.6.1981 issued by the Inspector, Sanskrit Pathshala. The case of the petitioners goes that in the year 1989, the State Government considered the provision of maintenance grant to fund salaries for teachers in the attached primary sections of conventional higher secondary institutions, where the primary section was recognized prior to the year 1973. A Government Order dated 6.9.1989 was issued, notifying a list of 393 institutions in the conventional system of education, whose attached primary sections were brought on Government grant-in-aid. The petitioners then say that a letter dated 5.3.1991 was issued by the Director of Education addressed to the Inspector, Sanskrit Pathshala, seeking information regarding attached primary sections of Sanskrit Schools, so that these could be considered by the Government for the purpose of extension of grant-in-aid to fund salaries of their teachers.
4. The matter, though in the notice of the State Government, did not receive attention, on
Adarsh Gramin Vidyalaya Sonakpur in Arvind Singh and others v. State of U.P. and others
Ashok Kumar Tiwari and others v. State of U.P. and others
J.P. Unnikrishnan v. State of A.P.
Markanday Mani v. State of U.P. and others
Mohini Jain v. State of Karnataka
Moti Chand Yadav and others v. State of U.P. and others
Ramesh Upadhya and others v. State of U.P. and others
Satish Chandra and others v. State of U.P. and others
State of H.P. v. H.P. State Recognised and Aided Schools Managing Committees
State of U.P. and others v. Pawan Kumar Divedi and others
State of U.P. and others v. Pawan Kumar Divedi and others
State of U.P. and others v. Tarkeshwar Nath Singh and others
State of U.P. v. Pawan Kumar Dwivedi
T.M.A. Pai Foundation v. State of Karnataka
Unni Krishnan, J.P. v. State of A.P.
Vinod Sharma and others v. Director of Education (Basic) U.P. and others
The State is obligated to provide salaries to primary section teachers in recognized Sanskrit institutions as these sections are integral to educational obligations under constitutional mandates for ....
The obligation of the State to provide free education under Article 21A does not create an automatic right for private institutions to receive recurring grants from the government.
The Right to free education does not confer entitlement to recurring aid for all private primary schools; compliance with legal requirements is essential for salary claims against the State.
The court affirmed the right to maintenance grant for the primary section of an institution, emphasizing its integral relationship with the main institution under the Act of 1971.
Employees appointed before the establishment of regulations under the Act 2000 are entitled to salary from the State Exchequer, as their appointments were valid under the Act.
The Delhi School Education Act mandates private schools comply with government salary norms for employees, irrespective of financial status, reinforcing the principle of statutory obligation over har....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the State Government complied with the court's order to revisit and reframe the policy, and the applicants did not qualify the test of composi....
The court established that the principle of parity in pay and allowances between government and minority school teachers is constitutionally mandated, and any deviation from this principle without a ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.