IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA

Cr. Revision No.153 of 2014

Reserved on: 14.11.2025

Date of Decision:04.12.2025

Rajinder Kumar ....Petitioner

Versus

State of Himachal Pradesh ....Respondent

Coram

Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge.

Whether approved for reporting?¹ No.

For the Petitioner : Mr. Abhinav Goel, Advocate,

Legal Aid Counsel.

For the Respondent/ : M r. Jitender K. Sharma,

State Additional Advocate General.

Rakesh Kainthla, Judge

The present revision is directed against the

judgment dated 19.04.2014 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge Ghumarwin, District Bilaspur, H.P. (learned Appellate Court), vide which judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 29.08.2013, passed by learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, H.P., were partly upheld. (Parties shall hereinafter be referred to in the

1. Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes

same manner as they were arrayed before the learned Trial Court for convenience.)

2. Briefly, the facts leading to the present revision are that the police filed a challan against the accused for committing the offences punishablef under Sections 279 and 427 of the Ind