IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Sushil Kukreja, J.
Imran Khan - Petitioner
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh - Respondent
Cr. MP (M) No. 2272 of 2025
Decided On : 12-12-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. accused beat de-addiction center inmates causing death. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. innocence, trial delay claims versus tampering fears. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. bail discretion weighs offence gravity, evidence, risks. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 4. prima facie record shows murder involvement. (Para 15) |
| 5. delay insufficient for bail in serious offences. (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 6. jail misconduct evidences aggressive character. (Para 21) |
| 7. bail denied for public interest, grave allegations. (Para 22 , 23 , 24) |
JUDGMENT :
Sushil Kukreja, J.
The instant bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (for short “BNSS) for grant of bail in case FIR No. 321/2022, dated 06.12.2022, registered at Police Station Nalagarh, Police District Baddi, H.P., under Sections 302, 323, 504 read with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code ( for short “IPC”).
2. Brief facts of the case, as per the status report filed by the respondent-State, are that on 06.12.2022, one Nand Lal, Chairman, New Serenity Home Center, Nalagarh, made a complaint to the police, stating therein that a quarrel took place in the Center and a person, who sustained injuries in the quarrel, was taken to PGI Chandigarh for treatment. Later on, the police was informed that Deepak Kumar who sustained injuries died in PGI. Thereafter, during the course of investigation, police recorded statement of one Vikram Singh under Section 154 Cr. P.C., who stated that as he was a drug addict so he was admitted in the Serenity Home Center on 20.11.2022. He further stated that during intervening night of 5/6.12.2022, at around 01:30 a.m., Sandeep Kumar, Gurwinder Singh, Imran Khan (petitioner herein) and Hardeep Singh came inside the Center and Sandeep Kumar shouted the names of Sumit, Ashok, Deepak, Shivam and Amrit Pal. Accused Sandeep along with other accused persons slapped Deepak and they also took off the clothes of Sumit Kumar, Ashok, Deepak, Shivam and Amrit Pal and thereafter for about three hours, with intervals, the accused persons gave beatings to the above persons. Accused Hardeep Singh gave beatings with the help of bamboo stick. Later on, the accused persons left the spot, however, at around 07:00 a.m., in the morning, they again came back and gave beatings to the above five persons. Deepak was lying on the floor, who asked for water, so Vikram Singh and others gave him water and he fell unconscious. Thereafter, the accused persons came inside and made Deepak to wear clothes and took him outside. After half an hour, accused persons also took other injured persons out of the room. In his statement, Vikram Singh further disclosed that while the accused persons were giving beatings, they were also using abusive language and saying “how dare you brought chitta (heroin) inside.” Injured Deepak was shifted to PGI, Chandigarh for treatment, but later on he succumbed to the injuries. On the basis of the aforesaid statement of Vikram Singh, police registered the case and the investigation commenced.
3. The police during the course of investigation, collected scientific samples, effected relevant recoveries and recorded the statements of the witnesses. Postmortem examination on the corpse of the deceased was conducted. Petitioner and Hardeep were arrested on 07.12.2022. On 19.01.2023, accused Sandeep @ Kola surrendered himself before the police.
4. As per the prosecution story during interrogation, accused Hardeep got recovered the chappals and bamboo sticks, with which, he alongwith Goni @ Gurwinder Singh, petitioner and Happy @ Sukhwinder Singh gave beatings to Sumit, Ashok, Deepak, Shivam and Amrit Pal on 5/6.12.2022 in New Serenity Home, Nalagarh. During interrogation, accused Gurwinder Singh disclosed that on 5/6.12.2022, at about 1:30 A.M., he alongwith Hardeep, Imran, Happy @ Sukhwinder Singh gave beatings to Sumit, Ashok, Deepak, Shivam and Amrit Pal with chappals and bamboo sticks at Serenity Home, Nalagarh. On 25.
Anil Kumar Yadav Vs. State (NCT) of Delhi
Central Bureau of Investigation Vs. V. Vijay Sai Reddy
Chenna Boyanna Krishna Yadav Vs. State of Maharashtra and another
Kalyan Chandra Sarkar Vs. Rajesh Ranjan alias Pappu Yadav and another
Mahipal vs. Rajesh Kumar @ Polia and another
Prasanta Kumar Sarkar vs Ashis Chatterjee and another
Ram Govind Upadhyay vs. Sudarshan Singh
In murder cases, prolonged pre-trial detention and trial delays do not warrant bail if prima facie involvement exists, offence gravity high, tampering risk present, and custody serves justice.
Successive bail applications require substantial changed circumstances, not mere trial delay or prolonged incarceration, especially in grave offences like murder.
Gravity alone cannot be a decisive ground to deny bail, rather competing factors are required to be balanced by court while exercising its discretion.
The right to speedy trial under Article 21 can justify bail due to inordinate delays, despite the serious nature of criminal charges.
Prolonged incarceration of undertrials due to trial delays violates Article 21 right to speedy trial, entitling bail after over 2.5 years custody with minimal trial progress and no tampering risk.
The right to a speedy trial is a fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution, and prolonged incarceration without trial is impermissible.
The right to a speedy trial, as enshrined in Article 21 of the Constitution, supersedes other concerns, justifying the granting of bail despite serious charges and prolonged detention.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.