Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V, K. V. JAYAKUMAR, JJ
ABDUL RASHEED @ DR.A.R.BABU – Appellant
Versus
THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appeals against common judgment regarding pmla. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. details of allegations and facts regarding the loan and properties. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. arguments about the legality of asset attachment and jurisdiction. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. court's observations on alternative remedies under pmla. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 5. procedural requirements for filing appeals under pmla. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 6. court's reaffirmation of jurisdiction over statutory remedies. (Para 12 , 13) |
| 7. definition and extent of 'proceeds of crime' under pmla. (Para 16 , 17) |
| 8. attachment provisions under pmla. (Para 19 , 20) |
| 9. interpretation of value and property under pmla. (Para 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 10. consideration of provisional attachment for asset recovery. (Para 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 11. final adjudication affirming the interpretation of statutory provisions. (Para 27 , 28 , 29 , 30) |
JUDGMENT
Raja Vijayaraghavan V, J.
These appeals have been preferred against the common judgment dated 07.07.2025 passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court in W.P.(Crl) Nos. 48, 124 and 151 of 2025. The above petitions were preferred by the petitioners challenging the orders passed by the competent authority under section 8 of the Prevention
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
