IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
M.B. SNEHALATHA, J, M.B.SNEHALATHA
Murukan S/o. Sasi – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala Represented By Its Public Prosecutor – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. conviction based on abetment of suicide under ipc. (Para 1 , 2 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. acquittal based on lack of evidence for abetment. (Para 7 , 29) |
| 3. arguments against evidence of abetment in suicide case. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 4. legal standards for abetment of suicide under ipc. (Para 18 , 19 , 21 , 22) |
| 5. prosecution's failure to prove men's rea and abetment. (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36) |
ORDER :
M.B. SNEHALATHA, J.
1. This revision Petition has been filed by the accused challenging the judgment in Crl.A No.30/2015 of Sessions Court, Alappuzha by which it confirmed the judgment of conviction and sentence passed against them by the trial court in S.C No.121/2009 for the offence punishable under Section 306 r/w 34 of Indian Penal Code (“ IPC ” for short).
2. In brief the prosecution case is that Sasidharan, who is the father of A2 and father-in-law of A1, committed suicide by hanging in his tharavad house between 5.30 pm of 16.7.2008 and 11.30 am of 17.7.2008 due to the mental and physical harassment and humiliation of the accused. According to the prosecution, accused abetted the commission of suicide by Sasidharan and thereby committed the offence punishable under Secti




Ramesh Kumar v. State of Chhattisgarh
Geo Varghese v. State of Rajasthan
Ude Singh and Ors. v. State of Haryana
Abhinav Mohan Delkar v. State of Maharashtra
State of West Bengal v. Orilal Jaiswal
Chitresh Kumar Chopra v. State (NCT of Delhi)
M.Mohan v. State represented by the Deputy Superintendent of Police
To convict under Section 306 IPC, clear proof of active instigation and direct acts leading to suicide is necessary; mere allegations of harassment are insufficient.
Abetment under Section 306 IPC requires evidence of direct instigation and established mens rea; mere allegations of harassment are insufficient for conviction.
To establish abetment of suicide under IPC, there must be clear evidence of instigation or aiding, which was absent in this case.
To establish abetment under Section 306 IPC, there must be clear intent and direct actions by the accused that compel the victim to commit suicide; emotional distress alone is insufficient.
To establish abetment of suicide under Section 306 IPC, there must be direct acts of incitement closely linked to the suicide, and mere denial of marriage does not constitute abetment.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.