IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
K. BABU, J.
Yahu, S/o. Ummer – Petitioner
Versus
State Of Kerala, Represented By Its Secretary, Home Department – Respondent
WP(CRL.) No. 1808 of 2025, WP(CRL.) No. 247 of 2026
Decided On : 10-04-2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts of unnatural deaths prompting investigations. (Para 1) |
| 2. arguments on fir requirements and inquiry procedures. (Para 2 , 6 , 8) |
| 3. court's observations on the role of police in investigations. (Para 4 , 5 , 9) |
| 4. ratio decidendi regarding investigations under sections 174 and 154. (Para 11 , 12 , 14) |
| 5. final conclusions directing investigations in both cases. (Para 33 , 34 , 35 , 36) |
JUDGMENT :
K. BABU, J.
The petitioners in these Writ Petitions seek a direction to conduct an investigation under the supervision of higher police officials. In both cases, the Police registered FIRs under Section 173 of the Baratiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS for short) (Section 154 Cr.P.C.) and submitted them before the concerned Sub-Divisional Magistrate as part of the enquiry into the apparent cause of death of the deceased. The deceased in WP(C) No.1808 of 2025 was found hanging at his rented residence on 03.08.2025. The dead body of the deceased in WP(C) No.247 of 2026 was found floating in the sea about 25 nautical miles west of Kochi coast on 13.10.2025.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that no FIR is required to be registered under Section 173 of the BNSS by the Police upon receipt of information regarding an unnatural death, and that the police officer is only required to intimate the Executive Magistrate about the receipt of such information. In Kerala, the practice is that such information is furnished by the Police to the Executive Magistrate in the form used for registering FIRs in cognizable offences. The learned counsel further submitted that when a police officer receives specific information from an informant giving him reason to suspect that the death is homicidal, an FIR within the meaning of of the BNSS is to be registered, simultaneously intimating the Executive Magistrate about the apparent cause of death.
3. This Court appointed Sri. Suman Chakravarthy as Amicus Curiae.
4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners, the learned Public Prosecutor and the learned Amicus Curiae.
5. The learned Amicus Curiae submitted that when the officer-in-charge of a police station receives information regarding an unnatural death for the purpose of conducting an enquiry under Section 174 Cr.P.C. (Section 194 of the BNSS), no FIR within the meaning of Section 154 Cr.P.C. (Section 173 of the BNSS) is required to be registered. The learned Amicus Curiae submitted that it is not the practice in many States in India to register an FIR initially in cases of unnatural death. The learned Amicus submitted that in the State of Karnataka, a UDR (Unnatural Death Report) case is initially registered and a report, along with the inquest report, is sent to the Executive Magistrate. When a cognizable offence is revealed, the proceedings in the UDR case come to an end, an FIR is registered, and the UDR proceedings merge with the police investigation under Chapter XII of the Cr.P.C. The learned Amicus submitted that the report of investigation regarding the apparent cause of death is to be submitted by the police in KPF Form No.72 of the Police Manual. According to the learned Amicus, an FIR under r/w Section 157 Cr.P.C. need not be registered for commencing an enquiry regarding unnatural death in the course of ascertaining the apparent cause of death. The learned Amicus submitted that the inquest report number (not the FIR number) is to be entered in Column 11 of the FIR registered under r/w Section 157 of the Cr.P.C. The learned Amicus further submitted that this makes it evident that the present practice of registering FIRs under read with Section 157 of the Cr.P.C. in the course of enquiry regarding the apparent cause of death is to be avoided. The learned Amicus submitted that the “investigation” contemplated under Cr.P.C. is not an investigation into a cognizable offence, but only an enquiry into the apparent cause of death. The learned Amicus submitted that the investigation within the meanin
Radhamma v. Director General of Police
Podda Narayana v. State Of Andhra Pradesh
Manoj Kumar Sharma v. State Of Chhatisgarh
Radha Mohan Singh @ Lal Saheb & Others v. State Of U.P
Distinction between inquiries and investigations under different sections of CrPC; obligation to inform victims about inquiry conclusions if no cognizable offense is revealed.
Point of Law : Section 190 of Code reads cognizance of offences by Magistrates.
(1) Scope of investigation in a proceeding under Section 154 of Cr.P.C. is very wide – In contrast, investigation under Section 174 of Cr.P.C. is an investigation on an inquiry into apparent cause of....
A prior inquiry under Section 174 does not constitute an FIR, hence a second FIR can be registered based on new evidence, permitting continued investigation regardless of jurisdictional issues.
The police are mandated to register an FIR upon receiving information disclosing a cognizable offence, irrespective of the credibility of the information.
The police are mandated to register an FIR when information discloses a cognizable offense, without questioning the reliability of the information at that stage.
The distinction between information under Section 174 Cr.P.C. and F.I.R. under Section 154 Cr.P.C., and the necessity to frame charges based on the material collected by the Investigating Officer.
Cognizance of an offence under Section 188 IPC requires a written complaint by a public servant; FIRs based solely on police reports are prohibited and rendered void.
The main legal point established is the mandatory registration of FIR if the information discloses a cognizable offence and the need for a preliminary inquiry in certain cases. The court emphasized t....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.