IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
Revati Mohite Dere, Neela Gokhale, JJ.
Anna Maruti Shinde - Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra - Respondent
Criminal Writ Petition No. 4107 of 2024
Decided On : 07-04-2025
(A) Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita - Sections 65(2), 74, 75, 76 - Protection of Children From Sexual Offences Act, 2012 - Sections 4(2), 8, 10, 21(2) - Indian Penal Code - Sections 377, 324, 323, 504 - Allegations of custodial death and police encounter - Petitioner sought registration of FIR and investigation by SIT after the death of his son in police custody during alleged encounter. (Paras 1-3, 6, 9, 10, 12, 24, 32)
(B) FIR Registration - Mandatory registration of FIR upon disclosure of cognizable offence - The court emphasized that the police are obliged to register an FIR without assessing the credibility of the information provided. (Paras 9, 14, 24)
(C) Investigation - The court mandated the formation of a Special Investigating Team (SIT) to ensure a thorough and impartial investigation into the custodial death, highlighting the importance of transparency and adherence to constitutional norms. (Paras 32-34)
Facts of the case:
The petitioner’s son was accused of sexual abuse and died in police custody during an alleged encounter. The petitioner sought an FIR and investigation due to perceived police negligence. (Paras 1-3, 6)
Findings of Court:
The court found that the police failed to register an FIR despite the disclosure of a cognizable offence and mandated the formation of an SIT for investigation. (Paras 24, 32)
Issues: The main issue was whether the police were obligated to register an FIR based on the petitioner’s complaint regarding the custodial death. (Paras 9, 24)
Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the police must register an FIR upon receiving information disclosing a cognizable offence, regardless of the information's credibility. (Paras 14, 24)
Result: The petition was disposed of with directions to form a SIT for investigation.
ORDER :
(Per Revati Mohite Dere, J.) :
1 The genesis giving rise to the present petition was an alleged case of sexual abuse of two, four-year-old girls at a prominent co-educational school in Badlapur, Thane in September 2024. The petitioner’s son, now deceased-Akshay Shinde was accused of the aforesaid offence and a crime bearing C.R. No.380/2024 was registered against him with the Badlapur (East) Police Station, Thane, alleging offences punishable under Sections 65(2), 74, 75 , 76 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (` BNS ’) along with Sections 4(2) , 8 and 10 of the Protection of Children From Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (‘POCSO’) Act. Akshay Shinde was arrested on 17th August 2024 and was in judicial custody in Taloja Central Jail in the said C.R. C.R. No.391/2024 was also registered against him under Sections 65(2), 74, 75 , 76 of the BNS along with Sections 4(2), 8 , 10 and 21(2) of the POCSO Act. Thus, two separate C.Rs were registered against Akshay Shinde for the two incidents that took place in the school. Both, the said CRs were transferred from Badlapur (East) Police Station to the Crime Branch, Thane on 7th September 2024. Later, another C.R., being C.R. No.409/2024 was registered against Akshay Shinde, with the Boisar Police Station at the instance of his wife, for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 377, 324 , 323 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code (` IPC ’). The same was initially registered as Zero FIR on 5th September 2024 and later was transferred to Badlapur Police Station on 7th September 2024. The said C.R. was transferred to the Crime Branch, Thane on 7th September, 2024 itself.
2 On 20th September 2024, the Crime Branch, Thane applied to the jurisdictional Magistrate and sought a production warrant of Mr. Akshay Shinde. The Magistrate issued an order on the same date, which warrant was produced before the Special Court, (POCSO), Kalyan where the Special Judge permitted the Crime Branch, Thane to take Akshay’s custody from Taloja Jail. Pursuant to this order, on 23rd September 2024, the officials from the Crime Branch took Akshay in custody from Taloja Jail after completing necessary formalities and at about 5:30 p.m. left the jail premises in a vehicle with a police inspector sitting next to the driver and one API and two Hawaldars in the rear of the vehicle. There was an incident of firing in the police van, during which altercation, Akshay lost his life and one officer sustained a bullet injury in his thigh. It is this incident which is alleged by the petitioner to be a fake encounter by the police.
3 The petitioner addressed a complaint to the Commissioner of Police (‘CP’), Kalwa, Thane and to the Deputy General of Police (‘DGP’) of the Maharashtra State via e-mail dated 24th September 2024 requesting the police to investigate in the incident leading to death of his son, Akshay. Aggrieved by the inaction of the Police in registering an FIR; conducting proper investigation; preservation of the CCTV footage of Taloja Jail, etc., the petitioner has filed the present petition, essentially seeking a direction to the police to register an FIR and conduct investigation through a Special Investigating Team (‘SIT’), amongst other reliefs.
4 When the matter was first taken up for hearing on 25th September 2024, apart from narrating a chronology of the incident, Mr. Venegavkar, learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent-State sought time to take instructions regarding registration of an FIR based on the petitioner’s complaint. The Court was also informed that the investigation in the incident was transferred to the State CID on 24th September 2024. Mr. Venegavkar assured the Court regarding the steps the police will take to collect evidence, including preserving CCTV footage from Taloja Jail until Akshay was taken to the Hospital post the incident, and sending the weapons to the FSL, etc.
5 By order dated 3rd October 2024, this Court put certain queries to Dr. Birendra Saraf, Advocate General appearin
The police are mandated to register an FIR upon receiving information disclosing a cognizable offence, irrespective of the credibility of the information.
The police are mandated to register an FIR when information discloses a cognizable offense, without questioning the reliability of the information at that stage.
An FIR must be registered for investigating suspicious unnatural deaths, distinguishing between inquiries under Section 174 Cr.P.C. and criminal investigations under Section 154 Cr.P.C.
The court emphasized the necessity for independent investigations and adherence to procedural safeguards in police encounter cases, ensuring that the right to life is protected under Article 21 of th....
The court mandates an independent investigation in police encounter cases, emphasizing the need for thorough judicial oversight to uphold accountability and protect citizens' rights.
The main legal point established is the mandatory registration of FIR if the information discloses a cognizable offence and the need for a preliminary inquiry in certain cases. The court emphasized t....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.