Back
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, R.KALAIMATHI
S. Bhaskarapandian – Appellant
Versus
Chairman/Secretary, Bar Council of Tamil Nadu – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's difficulties in enrolment as an advocate. (Para 1 , 3) |
| 2. judicial precedents concerning criminal cases and enrolment. (Para 2 , 5) |
| 3. limits of judicial discretion in disqualifications. (Para 4 , 6) |
| 4. role and limitations of the high court regarding enrolment rules. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 5. consideration for a larger bench to resolve legal uncertainties. (Para 12 , 13) |
ORDER :
1. The writ petitioner obtained law degree in the year 1984. However, he did not get enrolled as an advocate in view of his appointment as Village Administrative Officer. He retired from service on 30.01.2014. Thereafter, he wanted to enrol himself as an advocate. He submitted his application before the Bar Council of Tamil Nadu on 23.07.2014. His application could not be processed on account of his implication in two criminal cases i.e. Crime No.28 of 2013 on the file of the District Crime Branch, Madurai and Crime No.94 of 2014 on the file of the Koodal Pudhur Police Station. Hence, this writ petition has been filed for directing the Bar Council of Tamil Nadu to enrol him as an advocate on their rolls.
2. The petitioner faces a Himalayan impediment. A learned Judge of this Co
The right to practice law must adhere to explicit legislative provisions, where judicial directives cannot impose additional disqualifications beyond those established in statutes.
The court affirmed that pending criminal cases can disqualify candidates from enrollment as advocates, emphasizing the need for integrity in the legal profession.
The court mandated strict scrutiny of advocate enrollment applications, particularly for those with pending criminal cases or bogus qualifications, emphasizing the need for integrity in the legal pro....
The pendency of a criminal case against an applicant serves as a bar to enrollment as an advocate before the Bar Council.
Denial of enrollment based solely on the registration of an FIR for criminal offences is in direct conflict with the right to practice a profession or trade guaranteed by Article 19(1)(g) of the Cons....
The right to practice law as an advocate is a statutory privilege contingent upon meeting specific legal qualifications, not an absolute fundamental right.
The eligibility for enrollment as an advocate under the Advocates Act is contingent upon compliance with specific disqualifications, particularly concerning concurrent employment in government servic....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
