Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P. Dhanabal, J
Smt. Jothi – Appellant
Versus
Dinakaran – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the property claims. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. summary of parties' arguments regarding property rights. (Para 3 , 10 , 11) |
| 3. court's analysis of ownership and joint possession. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 4. finding on legal principles governing property inheritance. (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 5. final ruling dismissing the appeal. (Para 18 , 19) |
JUDGMENT
The Second Appeal has been preferred as against the decree and judgment passed by the Principal District Judge, Tiruvallur in A.S. No.4 of 2013 dated 25.08.2014, wherein the appellant herein, being the Plaintiff, has filed a Suit in O.S. No.9 of 2004 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Poonamallee for the reliefs of partition and permanent injunction and the said Suit was dismissed. Aggrieved by the said decree and judgment, the Plaintiff has preferred an appeal in A.S. No.4 of 2013 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Tiruvallur and the First Appellate Court also dismissed the appeal by confirming the judgment and decree passed by the trial Court. Aggrieved by the said decree and judgment, the Plaintiff has preferred this second appeal.
2. The case of the Plaintiff before the trial Court is tha
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
