Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.B. Balaji, J
R.S.Kannapiran – Appellant
Versus
M.R.Gopi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appeal challenges first appellate reversal of trial court dismissal. (Para 2 , 4) |
| 2. defendants argue simple mortgage, not usufructuary; no tenancy proof. (Para 6) |
| 3. evidence supports mortgage possession over tenancy claim. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. no tenancy without registration; civil court defers to statute. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
2.R.S.Arivalagan ... Appellants / Defendants Vs.
M.R.Gopi ... Respondent /Plaintiff Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code , to set aside the judgment and decree dated 30.11.2021 passed in A.S.No. 68 of 2019 on the file of the Additional Sub Court, Kumbakonam, Thanjavur District reversing the judgment and decree dated 28.06.2019 passed in O.S.No. 23 of 2015 on the file of the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Papanasam, Thanjavur District and thereby allow this second appeal.
For Appellants : Mr.Raguvaran Gopalan For Respondent : Mr.M.Ponniah
JUDGMENT
The defendants, who are the appellants, challenging the judgment and decree in A.S.No.68 of 2019 on the file of the Additional Sub Court, Kumbakonam, reversing the judgment and decree in O.S.No.23 of 2015 on the file of the District Munsif
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
