Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SURESHWAR THAKUR, VIKAS SURI
Dinesh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. allocation of flats based on eligibility. (Para 2 , 4 , 6 , 8) |
| 2. petitioner's claims against allocations. (Para 11 , 13 , 14) |
| 3. court's role in adjudicating public welfare cases. (Para 15 , 16 , 18) |
| 4. legality in decision-making process affirmed. (Para 20 , 21) |
| 5. final order dismissing the writ petition. (Para 22 , 23) |
JUDGMENT :
Sureshwar Thakur, J.
Through the instant writ petition, the petitioner seeks the quashing of the decision dated 14.9.2021 (Annexure P-20), taken in the meeting, wherebys respondent No. 2 allocated the membership of Super Deluxe category flat to respondent No. 3 who is the Managing Director of respondent No. 2, on preferential basis. Furthermore, the petitioner also seeks the quashing of the impugned letter dated 15.5.2023 (Annexure P-27), wherebys the membership of Super Deluxe category flat became allocated to respondent No. 4. In addition, the petitioner also seeks the quashing of the decision dated 25.7.2023 (Annexure P-32) taken by respondent No. 2 in its meeting, thereby regularizing the purported illegal allocation of membership of Super Deluxe category flat to respondent No. 4.
Brief facts of the case
2. It is averred in the instant pe
The court affirmed that society governing bodies can allocate memberships based on their rules, provided actions adhere to outlined eligibility criteria and transparency principles.
The court held that decisions by a governing body must be honored in flat allotment processes, emphasizing fairness and reasonable treatment in public property distribution.
Fairness and accountability are essential in the allotment processes of private societies, ensuring no favoritism or bias in decisions affecting members.
Housing societies cannot admit members for non-existent refuge area spaces sold as flats by divested developer, as it violates membership limits; distinguishes from unauthorized construction disputes....
Court upheld the rights of a bona fide member of a cooperative society to her originally entitled flat, reinforcing judicial authority to rectify unfair membership disputes.
Membership entitlements under cooperative society laws can be upheld even with delayed contributions if ratified by the society's governing body and presence of equitable factors.
Substantial compliance with statutory provisions ensures the legality of auctioning flats by a cooperative society, fulfilling the legislative intent while safeguarding member interests.
Allotment of land to Cooperative Housing Society – Land is a precious material resource of community and least which is required from State is transparency in its distribution.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation and application of Rule 20(1)(c)(i) of the Delhi Cooperative Societies Rules, 2007, in determining the disqualification of a mem....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
