SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 1853

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
BALKAR SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Balkar Singh ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents

1. The date when the judgment is reserved 13.01.2026 2. The date when the judgment is pronounced 10.02.2026 3. The date when the judgment is uploaded 11.02.2026

4. Whether only operative part of the judgment is Full pronounced or whether the full judgment is pronounced

5. The delay, if any of the pronouncement of full Not applicable judgment, and reasons thereof CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Present : Mr. Vineet Chaudhary, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Saurabh Mago, DAG, Haryana. Mr. Keshav Bhandari, Advocate for Mr. M. S. Kathuria, Advocate, For respondent No.7.

LAPITA BANERJI, J.

The prayer in the present petition filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, inter-alia, is for issuance of a writ in the nature of Certiorari for quashing impugned order dated February 24, 2020 (Annexure P-2) passed by the Assistant Collector 1st Grade-c um-SDO (C), Shahabad-respondent No.4, order dated September 28, 2022 (Annexure P-4) passed by the Collector, Kurukshetra-respondent No.3 and order dated September

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top