SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Raj) 2594

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
SUNIL BENIWAL, J.
Global Pharmacy College – Appellant
Versus
The State of Rajasthan – Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10763 of 2025
Decided On : 14-10-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : Shreyansh Mardia, Mayank Rajpurohit
For the Respondents: N.S. Rajpurohit, Kanchan Jodha, Nishant Gaur, Sajjan Singh Rathore, Pravin Kumar Choudhary, Akshiti Singhvi, Mahendra Vishnoi, Shagun Mathur, Tanishq Bafila

The State lacks competence to impose a ban on NOCs for educational institutes via executive order, which violates fundamental rights under Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution.

Headnote:(A) Pharmacy Act, 1948 - Article 14 and Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India - Moratorium on grant of NOC for B-Pharmacy courses imposed by State Government deemed arbitrary and discriminatory, violating fundamental rights - The State Government lacks legislative competence to impose such a ban by executive order. (Paras 7.1, 8, 11)

(B) Writ Jurisdiction - Scope - The High Court’s role in reviewing administrative actions taken by the State is to ensure that such actions do not violate the Constitution and are within legal bounds. (Paras 7, 10)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner sought NOC to start a B-Pharmacy course. The State imposed a ban on new B-Pharmacy courses only for private colleges without sufficient justification, leading to the petitioner’s challenge in court.

Findings of Court:
The court held that the State's ban was arbitrary, discriminatory, and lacked legislative backing, emphasizing that fundamental rights to establish educational institutions must be upheld.

Issues: The key issues included the legality of the State’s authority to impose a moratorium through executive order, the discriminatory nature of the ban on private colleges, and the justification behind the imposed restrictions.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the right to establish educational institutions is a fundamental right under Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution and any restrictions must be legislated, not executed by administrative orders.

Result: The impugned order dated 26.04.2025 was quashed, directing the State to issue necessary NOC to the petitioner.

Table of Content
1. arguments about the arbitrary nature of the ban. (Para 3)
2. concerns over employment demand for b-pharma graduates. (Para 4)
3. examination of legislative competence of the state. (Para 5 , 6 , 7)
4. reference to the supreme court's observations. (Para 8)
5. ban on private colleges viewed as discriminatory. (Para 9 , 10)
6. writ petition allowed against the impugned order. (Para 11)
7. noc must be issued to petitioner under valid criteria. (Para 12 , 13)
8. requests regarding fee refund for the academic year. (Para 14)
9. final directions issued regarding pending applications. (Para 15)

ORDER :

1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner - Institution with the following prayer :-

A. By appropriate writ, order or direction the order dated 26.04.2025 (Annex.12) issued by Government of Rajasthan Medical education “Group-I” department deserves to be declared illegal and be quashed and set aside.

B. That the respondent State may kindly be directed to grant NOC to the Petitioner institution for academic year 2025-26 and subsequent year;

C. By appropriate writ, order or direction the decision taken by Pharmacy Council of India in its 423th Execution Committee held on 12.02.2025 may kindly be declared illegal and be quashed and set aside.

D. By appropriate writ, order or direction the respondent State Government may kindly be directed to grant NOC in favour of the Petitioner institution to undertake the B.Pharmacy course for academic year 2025-26 and for subsequent academic years.

E. That the Rajasthan University of Health Sciences be directed to grant and continue affiliation for the academic year 2025-26 and for subsequent academic years.

F. Any other order or direction, which this Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may kindly be passed in favour of the humble petitioner;

G. The costs of the writ petition may kindly be awarded in favour of the petitioner.

2. Brief Facts :

2.1 The petitioner - Institution applied for starting degree course of B-Pharmacy and sought grant of affiliation so also NOC from the State Government. The inspection of the college premises was not conducted and in these circumstances a writ petition being SBCWP No.9008/2024 was filed and the same came to be disposed of vide order dated 23.05.2024 while granting liberty to the petitioner to approach the respondent authorities. In compliance of the said order, the inspection was conducted and report was submitted on 28.08.2024 (Annexure-3). The said report was in favour of the petitioner – Institution. Despite the said report, no action was taken, then the petitioner-Institution filed another writ petition being SBCWP No.3340/2025, wherein interim order dated 06.02.2025 came to be passed and directions were issued to grant consent of affiliation of the petitioner – Institution on provisional basis.

2.2 The petitioner – Institution was granted provisional consent of affiliation on 25.02.2025 (Annexure-10) by the respondent – RUHS. However, on account of non-submission of NOC and consent of affiliation before the Pharmacy Council of India (‘PCI’), the application filed by the petitioner for starting degree course of B-Pharmacy was rejected on 12.02.2025 (Annexure-11).

2.3 The State Government thereafter passed an order dated 26.04.2025 (Annexure-12) imposing ban on grant of NOC to the colleges intending to start B.Pharmacy Course operating in the State of Rajasthan so also for establishment of new colleges seeking to impart B-Pharmacy course. In these circumstances, the earlier writ petition being SBCWP No.3340/2025 was withdrawn by the petitioner on 14.05.2025 with liberty to file afresh. Hence, the present writ petition has been filed challenging the impugned order dated 26.04.2025 (Annexure-12).

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner while arguing the writ petition made the following submissions :-

(i)- The impugned order dated 26.04.2025, whereby the State Government has imposed ban, has been made applicable only

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top