SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 MarsdenLR 1607

HIGH COURT MALAYA PULAU PINANG
LIM GUANG ENG – Appellant
Versus
OH TONG KEONG & ANOTHER CASE – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Simon Murali,Kok Yuen Lin ,Respondent Advocate: Baljit Singh,Kernail Singh

Kenneth St James J:

Prelusion

[1] The Defendant: Oh Tong Keong (OTK) is a politician. He held a press conference. He invited the media to come to his press conference. He talked about the Plaintiff (P). P is a well-known politician. A press statement about the press conference was emailed out to various persons in the media.

[2] A "China Press" journalist attended the press conference. She wrote an article about what OTK said at the press conference. It was published in both print and online forms

[3] P sued OTK and the "China Press" for libel, for the allegedly defamatory words and statements in the press statement and the "China Press" article.

[4] Should P succeed in his cause for libel? In other words, does OTK and the "China Press" have defences to P's suits for defamation?

Preliminaries

[5] P filed two libel suits—one against OTK vide Suit PA-23NCVC-1-01/2021 (Suit 1), and the other against China Press Berhad vide Suit PA-23NCVC-2-01/2021(Suit 2). Both Suit 1 and Suit 2 arise out of OTK's press conference on 25 September 2019.

[6] In Suit 1, OTK applied for, and (I was informed) with the consent of P and China Press Berhad, obtained an Order dated 20 October 2021 to "consolidate" Sui

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top