SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 MarsdenLR 1399

HIGH COURT MALAYA SHAH ALAM
KAM SIEW – Appellant
Versus
TAN TONG KEONG & ORS – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Ooi Chih Jen,Khaw Eng Khoon ,Respondent Advocate: Chong Kah Heng,Ooi Xi Fang

Table of Content
1. court's ability to interpret contracts. (Para 1)
2. background facts of the case. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)
3. disputes and actions taken related to the construction works. (Para 11)
Wong Kian Kheong J:

A. Introduction

[1] This case raises, among others, two interesting questions as follows:

(1) whether the court can consider the oral testimony of a solicitor (X) regarding the meaning of a contract entered into by X's client (Y) when X had previously acted for Y in the negotiations and drafting of the contract; and

(2) when Y called X as a witness in a trial to give evidence regarding the interpretation of the contract executed by Y, has Y impliedly waived legal privilege attached to communication between X and Y regarding the contract under the second limb of s 128 of the Evidence Act 1950 ( EA )?

B. Background

[2] The plaintiff (Plaintiff) owns a double-storey bungalow situated at Lot 37409, Jalan Shahbandar 20/6, Bandar Mahkota Cheras, Mukim Cheras, Daerah Hulu Langat, Selangor Darul Ehsan (Property).

[3] Mr Tan Jia Yao (Jia Yao) is the sole proprietor of a business known as "UT Construction & Renovation" (UTCR). UTCR was initially the 3rd def

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top