HIGH COURT MALAYA SHAH ALAM
KAM SIEW – Appellant
Versus
TAN TONG KEONG & ORS – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court's ability to interpret contracts. (Para 1) |
| 2. background facts of the case. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. disputes and actions taken related to the construction works. (Para 11) |
A. Introduction
[1] This case raises, among others, two interesting questions as follows:
(1) whether the court can consider the oral testimony of a solicitor (X) regarding the meaning of a contract entered into by X's client (Y) when X had previously acted for Y in the negotiations and drafting of the contract; and
(2) when Y called X as a witness in a trial to give evidence regarding the interpretation of the contract executed by Y, has Y impliedly waived legal privilege attached to communication between X and Y regarding the contract under the second limb of s 128 of the Evidence Act 1950 ( EA )?
B. Background
[2] The plaintiff (Plaintiff) owns a double-storey bungalow situated at Lot 37409, Jalan Shahbandar 20/6, Bandar Mahkota Cheras, Mukim Cheras, Daerah Hulu Langat, Selangor Darul Ehsan (Property).
[3] Mr Tan Jia Yao (Jia Yao) is the sole proprietor of a business known as "UT Construction & Renovation" (UTCR). UTCR was initially the 3rd def
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.