Back
COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
SOON CHIN CHYE & ORS – Appellant
Versus
SURE COMMERCE SDN BHD & ANOTHER APPEAL – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction of appeals regarding late possession. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. purchasers' claims and developer's counterclaims. (Para 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 3. court reviews previous judgments. (Para 28 , 29) |
| 4. debate over applicability of hda 1966. (Para 30 , 31 , 34 , 35 , 36) |
| 5. suites deemed housing accommodation under hda. (Para 41 , 42) |
| 6. discussion on gst payments. (Para 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 56) |
| 7. claims for service charges and sinking funds. (Para 61 , 62) |
| 8. settlement agreements and their legality. (Para 65 , 66 , 67) |
| 9. conclusion and orders of the court. (Para 71) |
Introduction
[1] These appeals concern the late delivery of vacant possession of commercial accommodation suites, along with claims for indemnification related to the Goods and Services Tax ("GST") and late payment interest arising from the sales and purchases of those commercial accommodation suites.
[2] The Appellants in appeal No P-04(NCVC)(W)-51-02/2022 ("Appeal 51") and Respondents in appeal No P-04(NCVC)(W)-63-02/2022 ("Appeal 63") were the plaintiffs in the Sessions Court and respondents in the High Court. They are individuals and the purchasers of the commercial accommodation suites in iss
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
