SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 MarsdenLR 3593

HIGH COURT MALAYA MUAR
PP – Appellant
Versus
MUHAMMAD HUZAIRI RAZALI – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Mohd Radzi Yatiman ,Respondent Advocate: Nur Sulehan Abd Rahman

Table of Content
1. description of murder charges. (Para 1 , 2)
2. causes of death established. (Para 3 , 12)
3. establishing a prima facie case. (Para 4)
4. definition and assessment of prima facie. (Para 5 , 6 , 8)
5. ingredients of murder under penal code. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 37)
6. identification of the accused and acts. (Para 14 , 15 , 22)
7. witness account corroboration. (Para 18 , 19)
8. cctv evidence and its implications. (Para 30)
9. burden of proof in defence of insanity. (Para 44 , 57 , 68)
10. final judgment and sentencing. (Para 89)
Suria Kumar DJ Paul J:

Introduction

[1]The accused was charged and tried before me with two charges of murder, which are offences punishable under s 302 of the Penal Code (the Code). The charges read as follows:

"PERTUDUHAN PERTAMA

Bahawa kamu pada tarikh 12 Julai 2019 jam lebih kurang 5.50 petang bertempat di Kedai Kopi Sin Yew Yee, No. 12, Jalan Abdullah, Pekan Buloh Kasap, di dalam Daerah Segamat, di dalam Negeri Johor Darul Ta'zim, telah melakukan bunuh ke atas Ku Cheng Liong @ Ku Sot (No KP: 441031-01-5197). Oleh yang demikian kamu telah melakukan suatu kesalahan yang boleh dihukum di bawah s 302 Kanun Keseksaan.

PERTUDUHAN KEDUA

Bahawa kamu pada ta

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top