Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
CRCC MALAYSIA BERHAD – Appellant
Versus
M101 ENTITY SDN BHD & ORS (ENCLS 140 145 147 160 166 & 168) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. summary of the dispute and parties involved. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. factual background regarding the parties. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 3. issues surrounding performance bond and payments. (Para 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 4. plaintiff's case and allegations against defendants. (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31) |
| 5. defendants' responses and counterarguments. (Para 39 , 40 , 41 , 42) |
| 6. court's analysis on respective liability. (Para 51 , 52 , 56 , 60 , 78 , 89 , 100) |
Introduction
[1] This suit involves the dispute between the Plaintiff as the main contractor and the 1st Defendant ('D1') as the developer of the ambitious M101 Skywheel, a mixed development project with a gross development value of RM1.8 billion and touted as the world's highest SkyMall at a height of 316 m with an MRT station at its door step, retail outlets, SoFo units, designer suites, Asia's first ever Planet Hollywood Hotel and a Ferris wheel on the 52nd floor.
[2] Apart from D1, the 2nd Defendant ('D2') as its sole shareholder and the 3rd Defendant ('D3') and 4th Defendant ('D4') as D1's and D2's Directors were also named as the opponents in this suit.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
