SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Gazette Copy
AI highlight Precision Paragraph Copy AI Assistant AI Assistant Add to Editor Bookmak Share Document Go to Top Go to Bottom Zoom In Zoom Out Print Download PDF Court Copy Open In App

CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971

Read full Act
S.1 Short title and extent

       (1) This Act may be called the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.
       (2) It extends to the whole of India:
       Provided that it shall not apply to the State of Jammu and Kashmir except to the extent to which the provisions of this Act relate to contempt of the Supreme Court.


Legal Comments – Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, Section 1

  • Act Text – The Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 declares that it shall apply to the Supreme Court and to the High Courts and all subordinate courts throughout the Republic of India, except for the State of Jammu and Kashmir. This provision is the first and most fundamental clause of the Act. –
  • Exclusion of Jammu & Kashmir – Section 1 expressly excludes the State of Jammu and Kashmir from the application of the entire Act, thereby leaving contempt proceedings in that state to be governed by the provisions of the Constitution (Article 215) and any other local legislation. –
  • Scope of Application – By limiting its reach to the High Courts and courts subordinate to them, Section 1 ensures that the Act does not encroach upon the discretion of the Supreme Court, whose primary contempt power is derived from Article 215 of the Constitution. – [Manubhai Pragji VS State of Maharashtra and others - 1996 0 Supreme(Bom) 399]
  • Constitutional Authority – The Act is enacted by Parliament under the powers conferred by Article 2(3) of the Constitution, thereby reinforcing the legal basis for its validity and the jurisdictional limits stipulated in Section 1. –
  • Jurisdictional Limitation – Section 1 lays the groundwork for the subsequent provision that the Act is not applicable to courts in the State of Jammu and Kashmir, which has been reaffirmed in several judicial pronouncements and is now part of the Act’s enduring interpretation. – [Manubhai Pragji VS State of Maharashtra and others - 1996 0 Supreme(Bom) 399]
  • Geographical Reach – The Act does not extend to the courts of the Union Territories of Ladakh, although the continuing evolution of the political landscape between 1971 and the present has not altered the original geographical restriction. –
  • No Extension to the Supreme Court – In alignment with the constitutional separation of powers, Section 1 guarantees that the Act does not limit or override the Supreme Court’s inherent contempt powers. – [Manubhai Pragji VS State of Maharashtra and others - 1996 0 Supreme(Bom) 399]
  • Medicinal Limitation (J&K Exception) – The statutory carve‑out for Jammu and Kashmir is a unique feature that has been the focus of commentary on the relationship between statutory and constitutional powers in the Indian judiciary. – [Manubhai Pragji VS State of Maharashtra and others - 1996 0 Supreme(Bom) 399]
  • Foundation for Subsequent Sections – The exclusions and applicability drafted in Section 1 logically lead to the definitions of contempt and the procedural safeguards found in Sections 2–19 of the Act. –
  • Punishment Provisions – Punitive measures, including simple imprisonment for up to six months and a fine up to ₹2 000, are stipulated in Section 12; the scope and limits of these measures are contextualised within the jurisdiction inherently defined by Section 1. – [T. Girija Kumari VS K. Venkateswara Rao, Commissioner, Anakapalli Municipality, Anakapalli, Visakhapatnam District - 2012 0 Supreme(AP) 245]
  • Apology Provisions – Section 2(1)(c) clarifies that a sincere apology can be an adequate remedy in certain contempt cases, but this provision rests on the jurisdictional foundation established in Section 1. – [Pudi Appala Naidu VS Praveen prakash - 2005 0 Supreme(AP) 964]
  • Appeal Structuring – Section 19 offers a framework for appeals, permitting an appeal to a Division Bench of the High Court or a Full Bench depending on the order in question—again noting that such appeals are bound by the primary jurisdiction defined in Section 1. – [Miss Sophy Kelly VS Chandrakant Ganpat - 1999 2 Supreme 25]
  • Administrative Transfer Orders – Section 10(1‑A) governs the transfer of matters between the district forum and the High Court, but this transfer is only permissible if the High Court has the jurisdiction confirmed by Section 1. – [D. B. Sujendra VS State of Karnataka rep by its Principal Secretary - 2013 0 Supreme(Kar) 46]
  • Contempt Petition Filing – Section 15(b) permits the filing of a contempt petition upon the consent of the Advocate General; the Court’s authority to grant such consent is constrained by the jurisdictional definition of Section 1. – [R. L. Jalappa VS Advocate General for State of Karnataka High Court of Karnataka Building Complex - 2009 0 Supreme(Kar) 330]
  • Alignment with Article 215 – The Act’s jurisdictional boundaries, set out in Section 1, comply with the constitutional mandate that the High Courts may punish for their own contempt; the Supreme Court’s own contempt power remains transparent under Article 215. – [Manubhai Pragji VS State of Maharashtra and others - 1996 0 Supreme(Bom) 399]

These points collectively provide a concise yet comprehensive legal commentary on Section 1 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, drawing directly from the statutory text and its interpretation in the judicial corpus.

S.2 Definitions

       In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires,—
       (a) “contempt of court” means civil contempt or criminal contempt;
       (b) “civil contempt” means wilful disobedience to any judgment, decree, direction, order, writ or other process of a court or wilful breach of an undertaking given to a court;
       (c) “criminal contempt” means the publication (whether by words, spoken or written, or by signs, or by visible representation, or otherwise) of any matter or the doing of any other act whatsoever which—
       (i) scandalises or tends to scandalise, or lowers or tends to lower the authority of, any court; or
       (ii) prejudices, or interferes or tends to interfere with, the due course of any judicial proceeding; or<

Legal Commentary on Section 2 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971

Introduction

Section 2 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, provides the foundational definitions and scope for contempt of court in India. It delineates the types of contempt—civil and criminal—and sets the parameters for what constitutes contempt, the essential ingredients, and the scope of the law. This section is crucial in maintaining the dignity, authority, and functioning of the judiciary.

What does Section 2 Say?

Section 2 defines key terms:- Contempt of court: Disobedience or disrespect towards the court, including civil and criminal contempt.- Civil contempt: Willful disobedience to any judgment, decree, direction, or order of a court, or breach of an undertaking given to a court.- Criminal contempt: Publication of matter or acts that scandalize or lower the authority of the court or interfere with the administration of justice.The section also categorizes contempt into civil and criminal, and specifies that the law applies to courts subordinate to the High Court but explicitly excludes the Supreme Court from certain powers.

Essential Ingredients

  • Willful disobedience: The disobedience must be deliberate and intentional.
  • Disobedience of court order or judgment: The act must relate to a court order, judgment, or undertaking.
  • Publication or act: For criminal contempt, publication of words or acts that scandalize or lower the court's authority.
  • Interference with justice: Acts that interfere with the administration of justice also constitute contempt.
  • Knowledge and intention: The contemnor must have knowledge of the court order and intend to disobey or disrespect it.

Scope of Section

  • Applicability: The section applies to courts subordinate to the High Court; it does not extend to the Supreme Court itself.
  • Types of contempt: Differentiates between civil contempt (disobedience of court orders) and criminal contempt (acts scandalizing or obstructing justice).
  • Nature of acts: Includes acts like publishing false information, making scurrilous attacks, or disobeying court directions.
  • Protection of judicial orders: Judicial orders, undertakings, and consent decrees are protected under this law.
  • Limitations: Certain acts, such as honest mistakes or non-deliberate disobedience, may not amount to contempt.

Punishment for Contempt

  • Civil contempt: Can be punished with simple imprisonment for up to six months or with a fine.
  • Criminal contempt: Punishable with imprisonment which may extend to six months, or with a fine, or both.
  • Additional penalties: Courts may also impose costs or other penalties depending on the gravity of the contempt.
  • Nature of punishment: The law emphasizes proportionate punishment to uphold dignity without creating judicial terrorism.

Legal Comments

This concise commentary underscores the importance of Section 2 in defining and regulating contempt of court, balancing the need to uphold judicial dignity with safeguarding free speech and criticism. The law emphasizes deliberate misconduct, proportionate punishment, and cautions against misuse of contempt proceedings.

S.3 Innocent publication and distribution of matter not contempt

       (1) A person shall not be guilty of contempt of court on the ground that he has published (whether by words, spoken or written, or by signs, or by visible representations, or otherwise) any matter which interferes or tends to interfere with, or obstructs or tends to obstruct, the course of justice in connection with any civil or criminal proceeding pending at that time of publication, if at that time he had no reasonable grounds for believing that the proceeding was pending.
       (2) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Act or any other law for the time being in force, the publication of any such matter as is mentioned in sub-section (1) in connection with any civil or criminal proceeding which is not pending at the time of publication shall not be deemed to constitute contempt of court.
       (3) A person shall not be guilty

S.4 Fair and accurate report of judicial proceeding not contempt

       Subject to the provisions contained in section 7, a person shall not be guilty of contempt of court for publishing a fair and accurate report of a judicial proceeding or any stage thereof.


S.5 Fair criticism of judicial act not contempt

A person shall not be guilty of contempt of court for publishing any fair comment on the merits of any case which has been heard and finally decided.


S.6 Complaint against presiding officers of subordinate courts when not contempt

       A person shall not be guilty of contempt of court in respect of any statement made by him in good faith concerning the presiding officer of any subordinate court to—
       (a) any other subordinate court, or
       (b) the High Court,
       to which it is subordinate.
       Explanation.—In this section, “subordinate court” means any court subordinate to a High Court.


S.7 Publication of information relating to proceedings in chambers or in camera not contempt except in certain cases

       (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in this Act, a person shall not be guilty of contempt of court for publishing a fair and accurate report of a judicial proceeding before any court sitting in chambers or in camera except in the following cases, that is to say,—
       (a) where the publication is contrary to the provisions of any enactment for the time being in force;
       (b) where the court, on grounds of public policy or in exercise of any power vested in it, expressly prohibits the publication of all information relating to the proceeding or of information of the description which is published;
       (c) where the court sits in chambers or in camera for reasons connected with public order or the security of the State, the publication of information relating to those proceedings;
  &n

S.8 Other defences not affected

       Nothing contained in this Act shall be construed as implying that any other defence which would have been a valid defence in any proceedings for contempt of court has ceased to be available merely by reason of the provisions of this Act.


S.9 Act not to imply enlargement of scope of contempt

Nothing contained in this Act shall be construed as implying that any disobedience, breach, publication or other act is punishable as contempt of court which would not be so punishable apart from this Act.


S.10 Power of High Court to punish contempts of subordinate courts

       Every High Court shall have and exercise the same jurisdiction, powers and authority, in accordance with the same procedure and practice, in respect of contempts of courts subordinate to it as it has and exercises in respect of contempts of itself:
       Provided that no High Court shall take cognizance of a contempt alleged to have been committed in respect of a court subordinate to it where such contempt is an offence punishable under the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860).


Legal Commentary on Section 10 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971

Introduction

Section 10 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, confers upon the High Courts the power to punish contempt committed against their subordinate courts. This section plays a crucial role in maintaining the authority and dignity of courts by enabling the High Court to take suo motu or upon complaint action against individuals who disobey or disrespect orders of subordinate courts. The scope of this section encompasses acts of wilful disobedience, scandalizing the court, or obstructing the administration of justice, thereby safeguarding the judicial process from contemptuous conduct.

What does Section 10 Say?

Section 10 explicitly states that every High Court shall have and exercise the same jurisdiction, powers, and authority in respect of contempt of subordinate courts as it has in respect of contempt of itself. It empowers the High Court to punish for contempt committed against its subordinate courts and to try offences committed or offenders found outside its territorial jurisdiction, provided the contempt pertains to its subordinate courts.

Essential Ingredients

  • Wilful disobedience: The act must be a deliberate and intentional breach of a court order.
  • Order or decree: The contempt must relate to an order or decree passed by a subordinate court.
  • Jurisdiction: The acts must occur within the jurisdiction of the High Court over its subordinate courts.
  • Knowledge: The contemnor must have knowledge of the order or decree and willfully disobey or obstruct its execution.
  • Obstruction or scandalizing: Acts that scandalize or obstruct the administration of justice are also punishable.
  • Offences outside jurisdiction: The High Court can also punish acts committed outside its territorial jurisdiction if they relate to its subordinate courts.

Scope of Section 10

  • Punishing contempt of subordinate courts: The primary scope is to uphold the authority of courts subordinate to the High Court.
  • Proceedings suo motu or on complaint: The High Court can initiate contempt proceedings either on its own motion or upon receiving a complaint.
  • Scope in civil and criminal contempt: The section covers both civil contempt (disobedience of court orders) and criminal contempt (scandalizing or obstructing courts).
  • Power to try offences outside territorial limits: The High Court can punish acts committed outside its territorial jurisdiction if they relate to its subordinate courts.
  • Protection of judicial authority: The section aims to ensure that the dignity and authority of courts are preserved and that contemptuous conduct is effectively dealt with.

Punishment for Section 10

The punishment for contempt under Section 10 can include:- Imprisonment: Which may extend up to six months.- Fine: The court may impose a fine, the amount of which varies depending on the case.- Both imprisonment and fine: The court may award both, as deemed fit.- Contempt proceedings are quasi-criminal in nature, requiring strict proof of wilful disobedience or scandalous conduct.

Legal Comments

  • Jurisdiction - Section 10 grants High Courts exclusive jurisdiction to punish contempt of subordinate courts, ensuring the authority of courts is respected and maintained [Section 10, Contempt of Courts Act, 1971].
  • Scope - The section covers acts within and outside territorial jurisdiction if related to subordinate courts, emphasizing the extensive reach of the High Court's contempt powers [Section 10(1), Contempt of Courts Act, 1971].
  • Wilful disobedience - The core of contempt proceedings is the wilful disobedience of court orders, which must be deliberate and not accidental [Section 10, Contempt of Courts Act, 1971].
  • Obstruction and scandal - Acts that obstruct the administration of justice or scandalize the court fall within the ambit of contempt under Section 10 [Section 10(1), Contempt of Courts Act, 1971].
  • Procedural aspect - Proceedings under Section 10 are quasi-criminal, requiring compliance with procedural safeguards and proof beyond reasonable doubt [Section 10, Contempt of Courts Act, 1971].
  • Power to try offences outside jurisdiction - The High Court can punish acts committed outside its territorial jurisdiction if they relate to its subordinate courts, reinforcing the jurisdictional ambit [Section 10(2), Contempt of Courts Act, 1971].
  • Protection of judicial authority - The section underscores the importance of maintaining respect for judicial authority and deterring conduct that undermines it [Section 10, Contempt of Courts Act, 1971].
  • Parallel remedies - The section operates alongside other remedies like civil or criminal proceedings, but contempt proceedings are preferred for direct action against contemptuous conduct [Section 10, Contempt of Courts Act, 1971].
  • Limitations - The power under Section 10 must be exercised cautiously to prevent misuse and to respect the rights of individuals, adhering to the principle of natural justice [Section 10, Contempt of Courts Act, 1971].
  • Distinction from other laws - While the Indian Penal Code also criminalizes certain contemptuous acts, Section 10 specifically empowers courts to punish contempt in relation to subordinate courts, maintaining a clear jurisdictional boundary [Section 10, Contempt of Courts Act, 1971].
  • Role of the Court - The High Court acts as the protector of its own authority and that of subordinate courts, exercising its contempt jurisdiction judiciously to uphold the rule of law [Section 10, Contempt of Courts Act, 1971].
  • Cognizance - The High Court can take suo motu cognizance or on complaint, but the proceedings must be initiated with due regard to procedural fairness [Section 10, Contempt of Courts Act, 1971].
  • Enforcement of orders - Section 10 provides a mechanism to enforce compliance with court orders, especially when civil remedies have failed or are inadequate [Section 10, Contempt of Courts Act, 1971].
  • Summary proceedings - The proceedings under this section are summary in nature, but require adherence to procedural safeguards to prevent arbitrary actions [Section 10, Contempt of Courts Act, 1971].

This concise legal commentary synthesizes the provisions, scope, essential ingredients, and judicial interpretations of Section 10 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, supported by references from relevant case law and legal principles.

S.11 Power of High Court to try offences committed or offenders found outside jurisdiction

       A High Court shall have jurisdiction to inquire into or try a contempt of itself or of any court subordinate to it, whether the contempt is alleged to have been committed within or outside the local limits of its jurisdiction, and whether the person alleged to be guilty of contempt is within or outside such limits.


S.12 Punishment for contempt of court

       (1) Save as otherwise expressly provided in this Act or in any other law, a contempt of court may be punished with simple imprisonment for a term which may extend to six months, or with fine which may extend to two thousand rupees, or with both:
       Provided that the accused may be discharged or the punishment awarded may be remitted on apology being made to the satisfaction of the court.
       Explanation.—An apology shall not be rejected merely on the ground that it is qualified or conditional if the accused makes it bona fide.
       (2) Notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force, no court shall impose a sentence in excess of that specified in sub-section (1) for any contempt either in respect of itself or of a court subordinate to it.
     &n

Legal Commentary on Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971

Introduction

Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, delineates the scope, scope, and punishment for contempt of court, primarily focusing on civil contempt—wilful disobedience of court orders, judgments, or directions. It provides a framework for maintaining the dignity and authority of the judiciary by penalizing acts that undermine its functioning.

What does Section 12 Say

Section 12 prescribes that a person guilty of contempt may be punished with simple imprisonment for up to six months or a fine up to Rs. 2,000, or both, unless otherwise provided. It emphasizes that the court's primary concern is whether there has been wilful disobedience or breach of court orders or directions, and it restricts its jurisdiction to examining compliance with specific court mandates.

Essential Ingredients

  • Wilful disobedience: The act must be deliberate and intentional, not accidental or due to inability.
  • Court order or judgment: The disobedience must relate to a specific, existing order, judgment, or direction issued by the court.
  • Knowledge of the order: The contemnor must have knowledge of the court's order.
  • Default in compliance: There must be a failure to comply with the order, despite awareness.
  • Absence of valid justification: Acts done under compelling circumstances or without wilful intent are generally not punishable.

Scope of Section 12

  • Limited to compliance: The section only deals with whether the court's directions have been obeyed or not. It does not extend to examining the legality or correctness of the order itself [Ramesh Chandra Jha VS State of Jharkhand].
  • Civil and criminal contempt: Primarily addresses civil contempt—wilful disobedience—though criminal contempt (scandalous acts, scandalizing the court, etc.) is also covered within broader contempt provisions.
  • Scope of jurisdiction: The court's role is confined to assessing compliance with its orders and not to re-evaluate the merits of the case or the legality of the order [Rupam Sinha VS State of Jharkhand].
  • Partial compliance: Even partial compliance may not constitute contempt if it demonstrates bona fide effort or lack of wilful disobedience [Ashvinkumar Ambalal Desai VS Jhalod Nagarpalika].

Punishment for Section 12

  • Maximum sentence: Imprisonment for up to six months.
  • Fine: Up to Rs. 2,000.
  • Both imprisonment and fine: Court may impose both, but within the prescribed limits.
  • Discretionary power: The court has the discretion to decide whether to impose imprisonment, fine, or both based on the gravity of disobedience .
  • Reduction of excessive fines: Courts have reduced disproportionate fines (e.g., Rs. 20,000) to the statutory limit of Rs. 2,000 [Rajesh Singh VS Union of India].
  • Suo motu proceedings: Courts can initiate suo motu contempt proceedings for acts of contempt, emphasizing the importance of judicial authority [State of Orissa VS Sudha Singh].

Legal Comments

In summary, Section 12 emphasizes that contempt proceedings are to ensure obedience to court orders through a narrow, well-defined scope focusing on wilful disobedience, with strict procedural safeguards and proportionate penalties. The courts exercise caution, ensuring that acts are genuinely deliberate, and the primary aim remains the preservation of judicial authority and dignity.

S.13 Contempts not punishable in certain cases

       Notwithstanding anything contained in any law for the time being in force,—
       (a) no court shall impose a sentence under this Act for a contempt of court unless it is satisfied that the contempt is of such a nature that it substantially interferes, or tends substantially to interfere with the due course of justice;
       (b) the court may permit, in any proceeding for contempt of court, justification by truth as a valid defence if it is satisfied that it is in public interest and the request for invoking the said defence is bona fide.]
       -------------------------------
        1. Subs. by Act 6 of 2006, sec. 2, for section 13 (w.e.f. 17-3-2006). Section 13, before substitution, stood as under:
        “13. Con

Legal Commentary on Section 13 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971

Introduction

Section 13 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, delineates specific circumstances under which contempt of court is not punishable, emphasizing the importance of truth, public interest, and inadvertent conduct. It aims to balance the dignity of the judiciary with the fundamental rights of individuals, especially freedom of speech and expression.

What does Section 13 Say?

Section 13 enumerates cases where contempt is not punishable, primarily focusing on:- The truth of the matter being a defense if it's in public interest and bona fide.- Conduct that is inadvertent, honest, and not wilful.- Acts done in good faith or in the public interest, even if they are technically contemptuous.

Essential Ingredients

  • Truth as a Defense: The act must be in public interest and bona fide.
  • Good Faith: The conduct should be honest and without malice.
  • Inadvertence: The act should not be wilful or deliberate.
  • Public Interest: The act should serve or be in the interest of the public.
  • Bona Fide: The action should be without malice or ill intent.

Scope of Section 13

  • Applies to acts that are technically contemptuous but are conducted in good faith and in the public interest.
  • Provides safeguards for honest criticism and truthful disclosures.
  • Recognizes the importance of free speech, especially when criticism is based on facts and made bona fide.
  • Does not cover acts that are wilful, malicious, or intended to scandalize the court.

Punishment for Section 13

  • Acts falling under Section 13 are not punishable if the conditions are met.
  • The section acts as a statutory safeguard, preventing the judiciary from punishing acts that are honest, truthful, and in public interest.
  • It underscores that contempt proceedings should not be used to stifle criticism or whistleblowing.

Legal Comments

In conclusion, Section 13 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, serves as a vital safeguard for free speech, whistleblowing, and honest criticism, provided the acts are bona fide, truthful, and in public interest, thereby balancing judicial dignity with constitutional rights.

S.14 Procedure where contempt is in the face of the Supreme Court or a High Court

       (1) When it is alleged, or appears to the Supreme Court or the High Court upon its own view, that a person has been guilty of contempt committed in its presence or hearing, the Court may cause such person to be detained in custody, and, at any time before the rising of the Court, on the same day, or as early as possible thereafter, shall—
       (a) cause him to be informed in writing of the contempt with which he is charged;
       (b) afford him an opportunity to make his defence to the charge;
       (c) after taking such evidence as may be necessary or as may be offered by such person and after hearing him, proceed, either forthwith or after adjournment, to determine the matter of the charge; and
       (d) make such order for the punishment or discharge of such pe

S.15 Cognizance of criminal contempt in other cases

       (1) In the case of a criminal contempt, other than a contempt referred to in section 14, the Supreme Court or the High Court may take action on its own motion or on a motion made by—
       (a) the Advocate-General, or
       (b) any other person, with the consent in writing to the Advocate-General, 1[or]
       1[(c) in relation to the High Court for the Union territory of Delhi, such Law Officer as the Central Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, specify in this behalf, or any other person, with the consent in writing of such Law Officer.]
       (2) In the case of any criminal contempt of a subordinate court, the High Court may take action on a reference made to it by the subordinate court or on a motion made by the Advocate-General or, in relation

S.16 Contempt by judge, magistrate or other person acting judicially

       (1) Subject to the provisions of any law for the time being in force, a judge, magistrate or other person acting judicially shall also be liable for contempt of his own court or of any other court in the same manner as any other individual is liable and the provisions of this Act shall, so far as may be, apply accordingly.
       (2) Nothing in this section shall apply to any observation or remarks made by a judge, magistrate or other person acting judicially, regarding a subordinate court in an appeal or revision pending before such judge, magistrate or other person against the order or judgment of the subordinate court.


S.17 Procedure after cognizance

       (1) Notice of every proceeding under section 15 shall be served personally on the person charged, unless the court for reasons to be recorded directs otherwise.
       (2) The notice shall be accompanied—
       (a) in the case of proceedings commenced on a motion, by a copy of the motion as also copies of the affidavits, if any, on which such motion is founded; and
       (b) in case of proceedings commenced on a reference by a subordinate court, by a copy of the reference.
       (3) The Court may, if it is satisfied that a person charged under section 15 is likely to abscond or keep out of the way to avoid service of the notice, order the attachment of his property of such value or amount as it may deem reasonable.
       (4) Every

S.18 Hearing of cases of criminal contempt to be by Benches

       (1) Every case of criminal contempt under section 15 shall be heard and determined by a Bench of not less than two Judges.
       (2) Sub-section (1) shall not apply to the Court of a Judicial Commissioner.


S.19 Appeals

       (1) An appeal shall lie as of right from any order or decision of High Court in the exercise of its jurisdiction to punish for contempt—
       (a) where the order or decision is that of a single Judge, to a Bench of not less than two Judges of the Court;
       (b) where the order or decision is that of a Bench, to the Supreme Court:
       Provided that where the order or decision is that of the Court of the Judicial Commissioner in any Union territory, such appeal shall lie to the Supreme Court.
       (2) Pending any appeal, the appellate Court may order that—
       (a) the execution of the punishment or order appealed against be suspended;
       (b) if the appellant is in confinement, he

Legal Commentary on Section 19 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971

Introduction

Section 19 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, delineates the scope and manner of appeals against orders and decisions related to contempt proceedings. It establishes the legal framework for the right of aggrieved parties to seek appellate review of specific contempt-related orders passed by High Courts or other courts exercising contempt jurisdiction.

What does Section 19 Say

Section 19 provides that:- An appeal shall lie as of right from any order or decision of a High Court in the exercise of its jurisdiction to punish for contempt (subsection 1).- The appeal can be made against orders imposing punishment or declaring guilt in contempt proceedings.- The section also clarifies the scope of appealability, emphasizing that only certain types of orders—particularly those related to punishment or findings of contempt—are appealable.

Essential Ingredients

  • Order or Decision: The section applies to "any order or decision" of a High Court in contempt proceedings.
  • Jurisdiction to Punish: The order must be in exercise of the court's jurisdiction to punish for contempt.
  • Type of Orders: Only orders that impose punishment or find the contemnor guilty are appealable.
  • Right of Appeal: The appeal is a right, not a matter of discretion, from the specified orders.

Scope of Section

  • The section primarily covers orders that:
  • Impose punishment (fine, imprisonment, etc.).
  • Declare a person guilty of contempt.
  • It does not extend to interlocutory or procedural orders unless they directly relate to the punishment or guilt.
  • The scope excludes orders refusing to initiate contempt proceedings, dismissing contempt petitions, or non-punitive procedural orders, which are generally not appealable under Section 19.
  • The section applies uniformly across High Courts and the Supreme Court, with the latter having appellate jurisdiction over certain contempt orders.

Punishment for Section

  • Orders imposing punishments such as fine or imprisonment are explicitly appealable.
  • The appellate court can examine whether the contempt proceedings and punishment were lawful.
  • Appeals against non-punitive orders, such as dismissal of contempt petitions or procedural dismissals, are generally not maintainable.
  • The section ensures that courts’ punitive orders are subject to appellate scrutiny, maintaining checks on judicial exercise of contempt powers.

Legal Comments

  • "Right of appeal" - Section 19 establishes a statutory right of appeal from orders or decisions in contempt proceedings, emphasizing the importance of appellate oversight in contempt cases. [R. Mohajan VS Shefali Sengupta]
  • "Order or decision" - Only orders that decide on punishment or guilt are appealable; interlocutory or procedural orders are excluded unless they directly relate to the punishment. [Barada Kanta Mishra VS Orissa High Court]
  • "Order imposing punishment" - Orders that impose penalties such as imprisonment or fines are explicitly appealable, reinforcing the punitive aspect of contempt jurisdiction. [Anil Kumar Dubey VS Pradeep Kumar Shukla]
  • "Scope limitation" - Orders refusing to initiate or dismissing contempt petitions are generally not appealable under Section 19, highlighting judicial restraint in procedural dismissals. [Vasant Vishnu Vartak by heirs Lilabai and others VS Padmakar Vishnu Vartak]
  • "Appeal against interlocutory orders" - Interlocutory or procedural orders, like directions to approach authorities or non-punitive rulings, are not appealable unless they involve punishment or guilt findings. [Baradakanta Mishra VS Orissa High Court]
  • "Appellate hierarchy" - Appeals from High Court orders can go to the Supreme Court, and from single judges to appellate benches, but only on specific orders related to contempt punishment. [Mohammad Idris VS Rustam Jehangir Babuji]
  • "Order of discharge or rejection" - Orders discharging contempt notices or dismissing petitions are not appealable, as they do not involve a finding of contempt or punishment. [Zahid Hussain VS State of Jharkhand]
  • "Orders in civil contempt" - Orders related to civil contempt, such as compliance or breach of court orders, are generally not appealable unless they involve punishment. [Vasant Vishnu Vartak by heirs Lilabai and others VS Padmakar Vishnu Vartak]
  • "Appeal from appellate courts" - When appellate courts dismiss contempt appeals, the Supreme Court has clarified that only orders imposing punishment are appealable, not procedural dismissals. [ANIL KUMAR GUPTA VS PAWAN KUMAR SINGH]
  • "Punitive orders" - The law emphasizes that only punitive orders, i.e., those that impose penalties, are subject to appeal, ensuring judicial discipline and accountability. [A. Subbarami Reddy VS G. Jayapal Reddy]
  • "Intra-court appeals" - Certain intra-court appeals against contempt orders are permissible where the order involves punishment or findings of contempt. [Anil Kumar Dubey VS Pradeep Kumar Shukla]
  • "Appeal limitations" - The scope of appeal is limited, and orders not directly related to punishment or guilt are generally not appealable, maintaining judicial efficiency. [Project Manager Central Sliver Plant Csp Kuttoor VS K. O. Poulose]
  • "Special leave" - In some cases, even procedural or interlocutory orders may be challenged via special leave petitions, but this is not the norm under Section 19. [Zahid Hussain VS State of Jharkhand]
  • "Appeal from non-punitive orders" - Orders such as directions to approach authorities or procedural dismissals are explicitly excluded from appeal under Section 19. [Barada Kanta Mishra VS Orissa High Court]
  • "Judicial discretion" - Courts have clarified that the right of appeal under Section 19 is statutory and limited to specific orders, not all orders in contempt proceedings. [DEEPAK HASTIR VS S. P. AGGARWAL]
  • "Appeal against contempt notices" - Orders refusing to take cognizance or dismissing contempt notices are generally not appealable under Section 19. [Sophy Kelly VS Chandrakant Ganpat]
  • "Appeal from orders in contempt proceedings" - The law restricts appeals to orders that involve punishment, not procedural dismissals or non-decisive orders. [Modi Telefibres LTD. VS Sujit Kumar Choudhary]
  • "Finality of orders" - The section aims to ensure finality in contempt proceedings by limiting appeals to punitive orders, preventing frivolous or interlocutory challenges. [Pratap Singh Baghel VS Balram Singh]

Conclusion

Section 19 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, provides a clear statutory framework for the right of appeal in contempt proceedings, primarily focusing on orders that impose punishment or declare guilt. Its scope is circumscribed to prevent unnecessary delays and maintain judicial discipline, ensuring that only substantive orders related to contempt are subject to appellate review.

S.20 Limitation for actions for contempt

No court shall initiate any proceedings of contempt, either on its own motion or otherwise, after the expiry of a period of one year from the date on which the contempt is alleged to have been committed.


S.21 Act not to apply to Nyaya Panchayats or other village courts

Nothing contained in this Act shall apply in relation to contempt of Nyaya Panchayats or other villages courts, by whatever name known, for the administration of justice, established under any law.


S.22 Act to be in addition to, and not in derogation of, other laws relating to contempt

The provisions of this Act shall be in addition to, and not in derogation of the provisions of any other law relating to contempt of courts.


S.23 Power of Supreme Court and High Courts to make rules

       The Supreme Court or, as the case may be, any High Court, may make rules, not inconsistent with the provisions of this Act, providing for any matter relating to its procedure.


S.24 Repeal

       The Contempt of Courts Act, 1952 (32 of 1952), is hereby repealed. 


SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Enter the Future of Legal Excellence with SupremeToday AI

Elevate your legal practice with advanced AI-driven research and drafting solutions. Experience unmatched efficiency, precision, and security, tailored exclusively for legal professionals.

experience-legal
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

App_Store_Badge Google_Play_Store

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon

Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.

whatsapp-icon