SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1973 Supreme(SC) 18

A. N. RAY, D. G. PALEKAR, M. H. BEG, S. M. SIKRI, S. N. DWIVEDI
Sirsi Municipality By Its President Sirsi – Appellant
Versus
Cegelia Kom Francis Tellis – Respondent


Judgment

RAY, J. (for himself and on behalf of SIKRI, C.J.I. and PALEKAR and DWIVEDI, JJ.) :- The question which falls for determination in this appeal by special leave is whether the respondent is entitled to a declaration in a suit filed by her that her dismissal by the appellant Municipality referred to as the Municipality was illegal and void.

2. The respondent was an employee of the Municipality. Her services were terminated by a resolution dated 23 March, 1955. She was dismissed from service. She filed this suit for a declaration that the resolution of the Municipality dismissing her from service was void and that she continued to be in service of the Municipality and was entitled to emoluments from the date of the resolution up to the date of the suit.

3. The Municipality is governed by the Bombay District Municipalities Act, 1901 referred to as the Act. Section 46 of the Act provides that the Municipality shall make rules in respect of matters enumerated in that section. Clause (g) of Section 46 empowers the Municipality to frame rules regulating inter alia the period of service, the conditions of service etc.

4. Rule 183 framed by the Municipality provides that except in the c

























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top