Y. V. CHANDRACHUD, S. MURTAZA FAZAL ALI, P. N. BHAGWATI, N. L. UNTWALIA, R. S. PATHAK
Kewal Krishan Puri: Bharat Ice And General Mills: Sangha Gupta Rice And General Mills: Prahlad Rai Dwarka Dass: Sharda Cotton Ginning And Pressing Factory: Hans Raj And Brothers: Mata Deen Suresh Chand: Rathi Brothers – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab: State Of Punjab: State Of Punjab: State Of Haryana: State Of Haryana: State Of Haryana: State Of Haryana: State Of Haryana – Respondent
JUDGMENT
UNTWALIA, J.:—In these groups of Civil Appeals and Writ Petitions, Broadly speaking, the question which falls for determination is the validity of certain provisions of the Punjab Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1961 (Punjab Act No. 23 of 1961), hereinafter referred to as the Act, and the Rules framed by the States of Punjab and Haryana under the said Act as also the validity of the fixation of market fees from time to time by the various Market Committees in the States aforesaid under the direction of the Punjab State Agricultural Produce Marketing Board and the Haryana State Agricultural Produce Marketing Board. All these cases have been heard together and are being disposed of by a common judgment.
2. In the erstwhile composite State of Punjab the Act was passed in the year 1961 to consolidate and amend the law relating to the better regulation of the purchase, sale, storage and processing of agricultural produce and the establishment of markets for agricultural produce in the State. Under Section 3 of the Act the State Agricultural Marketing Board was constituted for the entire area of the composite State, which later, in the year 1966 came to be bifurated into the St
Ratilal Panachand Gandhi v. Stale of Bombay
Mahant Sri Jagannath Ramanuj Das v. Stale of Orissa
M. C. V. S. Arunachala Nadar v. Stale of Madras
Hingir-Rampur Coal Co. Ltd. v. State of Orissa
Corporation of Calcutta v. Liberty Cinema
Nagar Mahapalika, Varanasi v. Durga Das Bhattacharya
Delhi Cloth and General Mills Co. Ltd. v. Chief Commissioner, Delhi
Indian Mica and Micanite Industries Ltd. v. State of Bihar
Secretary, government of Madras, Home Department v. Zenith Lamps and Electricals Ltd.
Government of A. P. v. Hindustan Machine Tools Ltd.
Municipal council, Madurai v. R. Narayanan
State of Maharashtra v. Salvation Army, Western India Territory
HarShankar v. Deputy Excise and Taxation Commissioner
explained and limited : Chief Commissioner Delhi v. Delhi Cloth and General Mills Co. Ltd.
distinguished : State of Punjab v. Hari Krishan Sharma
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.