SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1982 Supreme(SC) 47

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Y.V. CHANDRACHUD, C.J.I.; A. VARADARAJAN AND AMARENDRA NATH SEN, JJ.
State of W.B. and others, Appellants
Versus
Swapan Kumar Guha and others, Respondents.
Civil Appeals Nos. 1129 and 1130 of 1981
Decided on 2-2-1982.
and
State of W.B. and others, Appellants
Versus
Sanchaita Investments and others, Respondents.

Headnote:

Prize Chits and Money Circulation Schemes (Banning) Act", 43 of 1978 - Section 3 - Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 226 - Conventional Chit and Prize Chit - Appeals are, in substance, by the State of West Bengal while the contesting respondents are a firm called Sanchaita Investments and its three partners - The two Matters in the Calcutta High Court were in the nature of writ petitions under Article 226 of Constitution which were filed by the firm and its partners for quashing an investigation commenced against firm. - Allowing the writ petitions, High Court issued a writ of Mandamus directing the State Government and its concerned officers to "forthwith recall, cancel and withdraw First Information Report and all proceedings taken on the basis thereof", since the searches, seizures and arrests made in pursuance of the said F.I.R. are, according to High Court, illegal and without jurisdiction - Held, Instant case do not disclose any element of chance in the matter of business carried on by the firm. It may, however, be said that these observations which were made while dealing with a case of chit fund are not of very great assistance while considering what may be a money circulation scheme within the meaning of the Act - As no offence under the Act is at all disclosed, it will be manifestly unjust to allow the process of criminal code to be issued or continued against the firm and to allow any investigation which will be clearly without any authority - In the view that I have taken, I do not consider it necessary to deal with other aspects, namely, as to whether the searches and seizures were lawfully and properly done - I, therefore, hold that the proceedings against the firm and its partners arising out of the F.I.R. must be quashed as the F.I.R. and the other materials do not disclose any offence under the Act and as such no investigation into the affairs of the firm under the Act can be permitted or allowed to be continued - I agree with the final order proposed by the learned Chief Justice In regard to the return of the documents, books and cash - Appeal dismissed.

JUDGMENT

Y. V. CHANDRACHUD, CJI. :—My learned Brother A. N. Sen has dealt fully with the various points argued before us. I agree respectfully with his judgment, but desire to add a few words in view of the importance which this matter has acquired by reason of the immense circulation of black money clearly and almost concededly involved in the affairs of the firm which is facing a prosecution.

2. These appeals by special leave arise out of the judgment dated March 5, 1981 of a learned single Judge of the Calcutta High. Court in Matters Nos. 2829 of 1980 and 37 of 1981 : (reported in AIR 1981 Cal 157). The appeals are, in substance, by the State of West Bengal while the contesting respondents are a firm called Sanchaita Investments and its three partners, Swapan Kumar Guha, Sambhu Prasad Mukherjee and Beharilal Murarka. The two Matters in the Calcutta High Court were in the nature of writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution which were filed by the firm and its partners for quashing an investigation commenced against the firm. Allowing the writ petitions, the High Court issued a writ of Mandamus directing the State Government and its concerned officers to "forthwith recall, cancel and withdraw the First Information Report ............ and all proceedings taken on the basis thereof", since the searches, seizures and arrests made in pursuance of the said F.I.R. are, according to the High Court, illegal and without jurisdiction. It has directed that the books, documents and moneys seized during the search be returned to the firm and its partners, including a sum of Rs. 52,11,930.

3. The short question for consideration in these appeals by special leave is whether the F.I.R. lodged by the Commercial Tax Officer, Bureau of Investigation, against the firm and its partners discloses an offence under S. 3 of "The Prize Chits and Money Circulation Schemes (Banning) Act", 43 of 1978. The Act, which was passed by the Parliament, came into force on Dec. 13, 1978 and the two years period allowed by S. 12 for winding up every kind of business relating to Prize Chits and Money Circulation Schemes expired on Dec. 12, 1980. The F.I.R., which was lodged the next day on Dec. 13, reads thus :

"To

The Deputy Superintendent of Police,

Bureau of Investigation.

10, Madan Street,

calcutta-72.

Sir,

On a secret information that Sanchaita Investments of 5-6, Fancy Lane, Calcutta, is carrying on business or promoting and/or conducting prize chit and/or money circulation scheme enrolling members of such chit and/or scheme, participating in those, and/or receiving and remitting monies in pursuance of such chits and/or scheme in violation of the provisions of the Prize Chits and Money Circulation Schemes (Banning) Act, 1978, inquiry was held secretly to verify correctness or otherwise of the aforesaid secret information. Enquiry reveals that the said Sanchaita Investments is a partnership firm, partners being Shri Bihari Prasad Murarka, Shri Sambhu Mukherjee and Shri Swapan Kumar Guha and that it was floated in or around 1975. Enquiry further reveals that the said firm had been offering fabulous interest @ 48 per annum to its members, until very recently. The rate of interest has of late been reduced to 36 per annum. Such high rates of interest were and are being paid even-though the loan certificate receipts show the rate of interest to be 12 only. Thus, the amount in excess of 12 so paid clearly shows that the Money Circulation Scheme is being promoted and conducted for the making of quick and/or easy money. Prizes and/or gifts in cash were and are also awarded to agents, promoters and members too.

In view of the above, Sarvashri Bihari Prasad Murarka. Sambhu Mukherjee and Swapan Kumar Guha appear to have been carrying on business in the trade name of Sanchaita Investments in prize chits and money circulation scheme in violation of S. 3 of the Prize Chits and Money Circulation Schemes (Banning) Act, 1978 and are therefore, punishable under S. 4 of the























































































































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top