Y. V. CHANDRACHUD, P. N. BHAGWATI, A. N. SEN, D. P. MADAN, M. P. THAKKAR
Lohia Machines LTD. – Appellant
Versus
Union of Indias – Respondent
Judgment
BHAGWATI, J. ( For himself, Y. V. Chandrachud, C. J. and D. P. Modon and M. P. Thakkar, JJ.):- These writ petitions raise an interesting question of law relating to the interpretation of Sec. 80-J of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and on the basis of certain interpretation, they challenge the validity of Rule 19-A of the Income-tax Rules, 1962 and also call in question the constitutionality of the retrospective amendment made in S. 80-J by Finance (No. 2) Act. 1980. The questions arising in these writ petitions are of considerable importance since they involve revenue aggregating to crores of rupees and they have been argued at great length on both sides
2. The principal controversy between the parties turns on the true interpretation of Section 80-J of the Income-tax Act. 1961 and hence we may begin our discussion of the issues arising in the writ petitions by examining the language of that section. But before we do so, we may usefully refer to the genesis of the provision enacted in Sec. 80-J and the transformation it has undergone from time to time over the years. It is in fact necessary to trace the historical evolution of this provision in order to arrive at its true interpre
Banarsi Das Bhanot v. State of M.P
Sita Ram Bishambher Dayal v. State of U.P
Hiralal Ratan Lal v. State of U.P
D.S. Grewal v. State of Punjab
approved : Century Enka Ltd. v. I.T.O
Kota Box Manufacturing Co. v. I.T.O
Ganesh Steel Industries v. I.T.O
Warner Hindustan Ltd. v. I.T.O
Kanai Lal Sur v. Paramnidhi Sadhukhan
Textile Machinery Corporation Ltd. v. C.I.T, West Bengal
Rajapapalayan Mills Ltd. v. C.I.T, Madras
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.