Back
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
A.P. SEN, J.
K.C. Vasanth Kumar and another, Petitioners
Versus
State of Karnataka, Respondent.
Writ Petns. Nos. 1297-98, 1407 of 1979; 4995-97 of 1980 and 402 of 1981,
D/-19-9-1988.
By a separate order court had added a few words of my own, for reasons to follow - Since then court have read and re-read very erudite and learned opinions recorded by court learned brethren - Court find that my separate opinion has invited adverse criticism since there are no discernible principles, for want of reasons – Held, court have said what court wanted in court opinion, and court cannot profitably add anything more - Court now convinced that giving of reasons in this particular case, would add to further confusion - Court accordingly direct deletion of the following sentence at the end of the opinion delivered Reasons for this decision will follow - Order accordingly.
Judgment
SEN, J. :- By a separate order dated May 8, 1985* I had added a few words of my own, for reasons to follow. Since then I have read and re-read the very erudite and learned opinions recorded by my learned brethren. I find that my separate opinion has invited adverse criticism since there are no discernible principles, for want of reasons. I have said what I wanted in my opinion, and I cannot profitably add anything more. I am now convinced that giving of reasons in this particular case, would add to further confusion.
* (1985) Supp SCC 714 at p. 769.
2. I accordingly direct the deletion of the following sentence at the end of the opinion delivered "Reasons for this decision will follow".
Order accordingly.
For Citation : AIR 1988 SC 2287= 1988(4) JT 773 = 1988(4) SCC 590 = 1989 LIC 1361.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
