M.M.DUTT, T.K.THOMMEN
Supreme Court Employees Welfare Association: Supreme Court Fourth Class Employees Welfare Association: S. P. Jain – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent
Judgment
DUTT, J.: - These Writ Petitions and Civil Miscellaneous Petitions have been filed by the employees of the SC praying for their pay hike. Two events, which will be stated presently, seem to have inspired the employees of the SC to approach the Court by filing Writ Petitions. The first of the two events is the report of a Committee of Five Judges of this Court consisting of Mr. Justice P. N. Bliagwati (as he then was) as the Chairman, Mr. Justice V. D. Tulzapurkar, Mr. Justice D. A. Desai, Mr. Justice R. S. Pathak (as he then was) and Mr. Justice S. Murtaza Fazal Ali. The second event, which is the most important one, is the judgments of the Delhi High Court passed in writ proceedings instituted by its employees.
2. The Five-Judge Committee in its report stated, inter alia, that no attempt had been made to provide a separate and distinct identity to the ministerial staff belonging to the Registry of the SC. According to the Committee, the borrowed designations without any attempt at giving a distinct and independent identity to the ministerial staff in the Registry of the SC led to invidious comparison. The Committee observed that the salary scale applicable to various catego
State of A.P. v. Gopalakrishnan Murthi
applied : M. Gurumoorthy v. Accountant General, Assam and Nagaland
relied on : Narinder Chand Hem Raj v. Lt. governor, Administrator, Union Territory, Himachal Pradesh
State of Andhra Pradesh v. 7: Gopalakrishnan Murthi
Aeltemesh Rein, Advocate, Supreme court of india v. Union of India
State of U.P. v. Renusagar Power Co.
relied on : A.K. Roy v. Union of India
Union of India v. Cynamide India Ltd.
Sarswati Industries Syndicate Ltd. v. Union of India
Panipat Cooperative Sugar Mills v. Union of India
Shree Meenakshi Mills v. Union of India
E.P. Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu
Aeltemesh Rein v. Union of India
Barium Chemicals Ltd. v. Company Law Board
referred to : Kishori Mohanlal Bakshi v. Union of India
State of Punjab v. Joginder Singh
Randhir Singh v. Union of India
State of Andhra Pradesh v. G. Sreenivasa Rao
V. Markendeya v. State of Andhra Pradesh
Umesh Chandra Gupta v. Oil and Natural Gas Commission
Tarsern Lal Gautam v. State Bank of Patiala
explained : Dhirendra Chamoli v. State of U.P.
followed : Mathura Prasad Bajoo Jaiswal v. Dossibai N.B. Jeejeebhoy
Thakore Sobhag Singh v. Thakur Jai Singh
explained and distinguished : Kirit Kumar Chaman Lal Kundaliya v. State of Gujarat
referred to : State of Orissa v. Durga Charan Das
C.V. Ramanaiah v. Superintendent of central Jail, Rajahmundry
Chandra Bansi Singh v. State of Bihar
Minor P. Rajendran v. State of Madras
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.