R.V.RAVEENDRAN, A.K.PATNAIK
K. K. Velusamy – Appellant
Versus
N. Palanisamy – Respondent
JUDGMENT
R.V.Raveendran, J. —
Leave granted.
2. The respondent herein has filed a suit for specific performance (OS No.48/2007) alleging that the appellant-defendant entered into a registered agreement of sale dated 20.12.2006 agreeing to sell the suit schedule property to him, for a consideration of Rs.240,000/-; that he had paid Rs.160,000/- as advance on the date of agreement; that the appellant agreed to execute a sale deed by receiving the balance of Rs.80,000/- within three months from the date of sale; that he was ready and willing to get the sale completed and issued a notice dated 16.3.2007 calling upon the appellant to execute the sale deed on 20.3.2007; and that he went to the Sub-Registrar’s office on 20.3.2007 and waited, but the appellant did not turn up to execute the sale deed. On the said averments, the respondent sought specific performance of the agreement of sale or alternatively refund of the advance of Rs.160,000/- with interest at 12% per annum from 20.12.2006.
3. The appellant resisted the suit. He alleged that he was in need of Rs.150,000 and approached the respondent who was a money lender, with a request to advance him the said amount as a loan; that the
Manoharlal Chopra v. Seth Hiralal
Ram Chand and Sons Sugar Mills (P) Ltd. v. Kanhay Lal
The Newabganj Sugar Mills Co.Ltd. v. Union of India
Jaipur Mineral Development Syndicate v. Commissioner of Income Tax, New Delhi
National Institute of Mental Health & Neuro Sciences v. C Parameshwara
R.M Malkani v. State of Maharastra
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.