T. S. THAKUR, FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA
BOARD OF CONTROL FOR CRICKET – Appellant
Versus
CRICKET ASSOCIATION OF BIHAR – Respondent
JUDGMENT
T.S. THAKUR, CJI. –
1. “Change” it is famously said is all that is constant in the world. And yet the world hates change, no matter, it is only change that has brought progress for mankind. Statesmen, Scholars and Scientists have spoken for change and eulogized its significance. For instance Charles Darwin has spoken of ‘change’ in the context of his theory of evolution and declared “It is not the strongest of the species that survive, not the most intelligent, but the one most responsive to change.” Benjamin Franklin, put it more pithily when he said “When you’re finished changing, you’re finished”. Albert Einstein spoke of change when he said “The world as we have created is a process of our thinking. It cannot be changed without changing our thinking.” The truth is that resistance to change stems partly from people getting used to status quo and partly because any change is perceived to affect their vested interest in terms of loss of ego, status, power or resources. This is true particularly when the suggested change is structural or organizational which involves some threat, real or perceived, of personal loss to those involved. No wonder, therefore, that the portents o
Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India
BCCI v. Cricket Association of Bihar
Viveka Nand Sethi v. Chairman, J & K Bank Ltd., (2005) 5 SCC
State of Punjab v. Jagir Singh
Karnataka SRTC v. S.G. Kotturappa
Damyanti Naranga v. The Union of India
Zee Telefilms Ltd. v. Union of India
All India Bank Employees Association v. The National Industrial Tribunal (Bank Disputes), Bombay
Tata Engineering and Locomotive Company Ltd. v. State of Bihar
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.