SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
A.N. Ray, CJI., R.S. Sarkaria, P.N. Shinghal, Jaswant Singh, JJ.
Excise Commissioner U.P. Allahabad etc. etc. - Appellant
Versus
Ram Kumar etc. - Respondent
Civil Appeals Nos. 276-395 and 397-404 of 1975
Decided On : 07-05-1976
Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 226 - U - P Excise Act, 1910 - Sections 24, 31, 33, 28, 12, 13, 17, 18, 29, 40, 41 - U - P Sales Tax Act, 1948 - Sections 4, 3-A – Manufacture and Retail Sale – Auction Fee System - Paragraph of Excise Manual shows that there are four licence-fee systems in vogue in State - One of such systems is auction fee systems under which amount of licence fees inter alia for retail sale of country spirit under distillery system and for manufacture and retail sale of country spirit under out still systems is determined by competition among bidders - According to paragraph licences for wholesale and retail vend of intoxicants are usually granted for excise year which commences - Held, It was held by a Bench of this Court that Evacuee Department was not bound by reply given by Assistant Custodian to first respondents enquiry that property in question was not an evacuee property - Courts will only bind Government by its promises to prevent manifest injustice or fraud and will not make Government a slave of its policy for all times to come when Government acts in its Governmental public or sovereign capacity - Order accordingly.
JUDGMENT :
Jaswant Singh, J.
This batch of 128 appeals by special leave which are directed against various judgments rendered by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in writ petitions and special appeals and relate to enforcement of certain obligations of licenses for retail vend of country liquor shall be disposed of by this judgment.
2. The facts leading to these appeals are : The State of Uttar Pradesh has, under the U.P. Excise Act, 1910 (Act No. IV of 1910) (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') which contains provisions relating to all aspects and manifestations of intoxicating liquors and intoxicating drugs, that is to say, their import, export, transport manufacture, sale possession, the exclusive right or privilege of manufacturing and selling liquor in that State. Section 24 of the Act lays down that subject to the provisions of Section 31, the Excise Commissioner may grant to any person a licence for the exclusive privilege -
(2) of selling by wholesale or by retail; or
(3) of manufacturing or of supplying by wholesale, or of both and of selling by retail; any country liquor or intoxicating drug within any local area.
3. Section 31 provides that every licence, permit or pass granted under the Act shall be granted -
(b) subject to such restrictions and as on such conditions;
(c) shall be in such form and contain such particulars, as the Excise Commissioner may direct either generally or in any particular instance in this behalf; and
(d) shall be granted for such period as the State Government may, in like manner, direct.
4. Section 33 of the Act invests the authority granting a licence under the Act to require the grantee to execute a counterpart agreement in conformity with the tenor of his licence and to give such security for the performance of such agreement or to make such deposit in lieu of security as such authority may think fit.
5. Section 28 of the Act which deals with imposition of excise duty or countervailing duty reads :-
(a) imported in accordance with the provisions of Section 12 (1); or
(b) exported in accordance with the provisions of Section 13; or
(c) transported; or
(d) manufactured, cultivated or collected under any licence granted under Section 17; or
(e) manufactured in any distillery established, or any distillery or brewery licensed, under Section 18: ........"
6. Section 29 of the Act lays down the manner in which the duty may be levied. One of the ways provided in the section for levy of the duty is by payment upon issue for sale from a warehouse established or licensed under Section 18 (d) of the Act.
7. Sections 40 and 41 of the Act empower the State Government and the Excise Commissioner (subject to the previous sanction of the Government) to make rules for the purposes set out therein. These rules are contained in the Excise Manual, Uttar Pradesh (Volume I).
8. Paragraph 38 of the Excise Manual shows that there are four licence-fee systems in vogue in the State of Uttar Pradesh. One of such systems is "The auction fee systems' under which the amount of licence fees inter alia for the retail sale of country spirit under the distillery system and for the manufacture and retail sale of country spirit under the 'out still' systems is determined by competition among bidders. According to paragraph 332 licences for the wholesale and retail vend of intoxicants are usually granted for the excise year which commences from April 1 and lasts upto March 31.
9. In accordance with the requirements of the auction system, auctions were held throughout Uttar Pradesh during the months of February and March, 1969 on various dates and at various places for the grant of licences
Bimal Chandra Banerjee v. State of Madhya Pradesh
Panna Lal v. State of Rajasthan
Ramanathan Pillai v. State of Kerala
State of Kerala v. Gwalior Rayon Silk Manufacturing (Wvg.) Co. Ltd.
Lords in Howell v. Falmouth Boat Construction Co. Ltd.
Assistant Custodian Evacuee Property v. Brij Jishore Agarwala
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.