MONORANJAN MALLICK, BHAGABATI PRASAD BANERJEE, G.N.RAY
LAKSHMIMONI DAS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS Rule namely C R. No. 11382 (W) of 1982 has been heard analogously with other Civil; Rules because common questions of law are involved in all these cases, Civil Rule No. 1382 (W) of 1982 and a number of other writ cases challenging the vires of the Calcutta Thika Tenancy (Acquisition and Regulation) Act, 1981 came up for hearing before a Division Bench of this Court. On 12th December, 1985, the said Division Bench was pleased to make a reference to the Special Bench by the following order:-"these group of writ petitions challenge the vires of the Calcutta Thika Tenancy (Acquisition and Regulation) Act, 1981. On the question of applicability of the Act to certain kinds of land, it may become necessary to reconsider a Division Bench decision of this Court in Appeal No. 239 of 1978 (Jatadhari Daw and Grandsons v. Smt. Radha Debi and Anr.) pronounced on September 6, 1985. We deem it desirable that these group of writ petitions may properly engage the attention of the Special Division Bench. Other questions raised in these writ petitions relate to substantial questions of law of general importance. In the circumstances, the entire cases may be referred to the S
K.M.Chinai and Anr. v. State of Gujarat and Ors.
Nagpur Improvement Thust and Anr. v. Vithal Rao and Ors.
Deputy Commissioner and Collector, Kamrup and Ors. v. Durganath Sharma
Ramendra Nath v. State of West Bengal
Charanjit Lal v. Union of India
Burma Oil Company v. Lord Advocate
State of Madhya Pradesh and Anr. v. Baldeo Prasad
Governor General in Council v. Province of Madras
S.I.Corporation Pvt. v. Secy. Board of Revenue
Sree Sayjan Mills v. I.T.Commissioner, Bhopal
Harak Chand Ratan Chand Bonthia v. Union of India
Bennat Coleman I Co. Ltd. v. Union of India
Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India
Govid v. State of Madhya Pradesh
H.D.Vora v. State of Maharastra
N.Saksena v. State of Madhya Pradesh
Must. Hasnear Khatun v. Revenue Officer, Midnapore
Banku Behari Dutta v. State of West Bengal
Prokash Amin Chand Shah v. State of Gujarat
State of West Bengal v. Asitendra Nath Mitter
State of Karnataka v. Ranghanatha Beddy
Sadruddin Suleman Jhaveri v. J.H.Patwardhan
Narain Swadeshi Weaving Mills v. Commissioner of Excess Profits Tax
Municipal Committee Amritsar v. State of Punjab
Polester and Co. Ltd. v. A.dditional Commissioner of Sales Tax, New Delhi
Minerva Mills Ltd. v. Union of India
Bafutulla, Mukhtar v. State of West Bengal
REFERRED TO : Attorney General v. HRH Princes Earnest Augustus of Hanover
His Holiness Keshavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala and Anr.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.