S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.

1. The reference to this larger, Special Bench of five judges, was occasioned by the detailed speaking order of a learned Single Judge, in the present suit, which sought the reliefs of infringement of design and a decree for injunction against passing off. The learned Single Judge, by the order dated 02.05.2017, referred the question as on the whether the decision in Mohan Lal vs. Sona Paint, 2013 (55) PTC 61 (Del) (FB) - hereafter "Mohan Lal" on the aspect of maintainability of a composite suit in relation to infringement of a registered design and for passing off, where the parties to the proceedings are the same needs re-consideration by a larger bench in the light of Order 2, Rule 3 CPC, which permits joinder of causes of action. The decision in Mohan Lal (supra) was by a Full Bench of three judges. During the pendency of this reference the dispute inter parties was rendered moot due to a mutually acceptable settlement; nevertheless this court was requested to hear and decide the dated.

2. We had the benefit of the draft judgment by Valmiki. J. Mehta, J. We agree with his conclusions as well as his analysis and reasoning. However, we are of opinion