SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
RAJIV SHAKDHER, TARA VITASTA GANJU
Vallabh Textiles – Appellant
Versus
Senior Intelligence Officer – Respondent


JUDGMENT

[Physical Court hearing/ Hybrid hearing (as per request)]

TABLE OF CONTENTS

    Preface:

    Background:

    Submissions of the counsels:

    Reasons and Analysis:

    Conclusion:

Rajiv Shakdher, J.

Preface:

1. The sole question which arises for our consideration is: whether the cumulative sum of Rs.1,80,10,000/- deposited on behalf of the petitioner- concern, during search proceedings carried out between 16.02.2022 and 17.02.2022, was a voluntary act or not.

2. The petitioner claims, that the aforementioned amount was deposited in four (4) tranches, between 01:28 A.M. and 07:03 A.M. on 17.02.2022.

3. It is the petitioner's case, that the search commenced at about 03:30 PM on 16.02.2022 and ended at 09:30 AM on 17.02.2022.

4. Respondents no. 1 and 2 ["official respondents"]/revenue, however, contend to the contrary.

4.1. It is the official respondents/revenue's broad stand, that the aforementioned amount was deposited against challan(s) submitted in the prescribed form i.e., Form GST DRC-03, each of which is dated 17.02.2022.

5. The official respondents/revenue, thus, take the position, that the allegation of coercion is an afterthought, which was raised only on 25.05.2022 after su

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top