R. SUBRAMANIAN, N. SENTHILKUMAR
Kavitha – Appellant
Versus
V. Damodaran – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(R. Subramanian, J.)
AS No.891 of 2012 is by the plaintiff in OS No.109 of 2010, a suit for partition laid by her claiming 1/3rd share in the suit ‘B’ to ‘E’ Schedule properties.
2. According to the plaintiff, the properties were ancestral properties inherited by the first defendant Damodaran under a Will dated 29.02.1972 executed by his father Varadarasu Kounder. It is the contention of the plaintiff that under the Will Damodaran was given a life estate and the properties were to be taken absolutely by the children of Damodaran on his death. It is the further contention of the plaintiff that one Kanagambaram Ammal, widow of one of the sons of Varadarasu Kounder viz. Ramachandran, was given a life estate in some other properties and on her death, those properties would devolve on Damodharan and Krishnan other two sons of Varadarasu Kounder.
3. It was pleaded that Kanagambaram Ammal also died on 28.09.2011 and therefore, the plaintiff would be entitled to 1/3rd share in those properties also which were shown in Schedule ‘B’ and ‘C’ to the plaint. As regards the properties shown in Schedule ‘D’ and ‘E’, it was the contention of the plaintiff that those properties were acqui
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.