Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query!
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query!
Scanned Judgements…!
The legislative intent behind Section 138 and related amendments emphasizes the importance of credibility of negotiable instruments, and reasons like account blockage are recognized as legitimate grounds for dishonour, aligning with judicial interpretations ["M.Star Janet Joy vs T.Justin Dhas - Madras"], ["A.Arun vs M/s.New Everest Traders - Madras"].
Analysis and Conclusion:
In the fast-paced world of commercial transactions, cheques remain a cornerstone of trust and reliability. But what happens when a cheque bounces with the reason account blocked? Does this excuse the drawer from liability under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (NI Act)? This question often arises in disputes, leaving payees frustrated and drawers seeking legal cover. While no direct precedent definitively settles this, courts generally scrutinize such claims through the lens of banking regulations, proportionality, and the Act's goal of upholding instrument credibility. This post breaks down the legal landscape, drawing from statutory provisions and judicial insights—remember, this is general information, not specific legal advice. Consult a lawyer for your case.
The NI Act, 1881, governs instruments like cheques to ensure smooth transactions. Section 138 criminalizes dishonour due to insufficient funds or exceeds the amount arranged to be paid, aiming to deter frivolous issuances and boost trust. Gopal Singh vs Hira Lal (since deceased) through LRs - 2025 0 Supreme(HP) 294 The provision's deterrent effect is clear: it promotes accountability, with penalties including imprisonment up to two years or fines. Gopal Singh vs Hira Lal (since deceased) through LRs - 2025 0 Supreme(HP) 294
Key procedural steps include cheque presentation, dishonour notice within 30 days, and complaint filing within a month of notice expiry. INDERCHAND s/o LAKHICHAND KHIVSAR VS GOKUL s/o PITAMBAR PATIL - Dishonour Of Cheque (2006) Account blocking—often due to fraud suspicion, legal orders, or bank policies—complicates this. Banks may restrict accounts under contractual terms and regulations, but does account blocked as a return reason absolve the drawer?
Banks can block accounts for valid reasons like suspected fraud or court orders, but restrictions must not be arbitrary. Courts recognize this authority yet demand proportionality to protect account holders' rights. Blocking can hinder cheque clearance, impacting transactions, but it's typically upheld if justified. Gopal Singh vs Hira Lal (since deceased) through LRs - 2025 0 Supreme(HP) 294
In one case, where an account was blocked since 2017, issuing a cheque in 2021 despite knowledge of the block undermined the drawer's defense. The court noted: it was well known to the applicant that the Bank account was blocked in the year 2017 itself and he issued the cheque on 24.03.2021 having knowledge that the account was not being maintained. Shiv Kumar Sharma VS State of U. P. - 2023 Supreme(All) 555 This highlights that prior awareness of restrictions weakens claims of innocence.
Under Section 138, even blocked accounts don't automatically negate liability. Banks may block post-dishonour to prevent misuse, but drawers bear the onus to honor commitments. Courts balance bank interests with fairness: restrictions must be transparent and lawful. INDERCHAND s/o LAKHICHAND KHIVSAR VS GOKUL s/o PITAMBAR PATIL - Dishonour Of Cheque (2006) If blocking precedes issuance, and the drawer knows, it may not stand as a defense—especially with presumptions under Sections 118 and 139 favoring consideration and validity. Jayalal C. D. @ Chandran VS State Of Kerala - 2023 Supreme(Ker) 678 Section 139 is a reverse onus clause to enhance credibility: Until the contrary is proved... every negotiable instrument was made or drawn for consideration. Jayalal C. D. @ Chandran VS State Of Kerala - 2023 Supreme(Ker) 678
No Supreme Court ruling directly addresses account blocked as a standalone defense, but precedents emphasize context:
Courts stress: restrictions shouldn't unjustly impede Section 138 processes. Sentences like two months' imprisonment deter misuse, underscoring the Act's intent. Gopal Singh vs Hira Lal (since deceased) through LRs - 2025 0 Supreme(HP) 294
Typically, it may if:- Blocking stems from a court order or fraud unrelated to the cheque.- Drawer proves lack of knowledge or funds were arranged but blocked externally.- Payee contributed to the block (rare).
However, self-induced blocks or known restrictions rarely excuse. In stop-payment cases tied to sales, courts deemed it cheating under IPC Section 415. Gopi Ram Jain VS Attar Singh - 2019 Supreme(P&H) 368
For Payees (Complainants):- Document notice and dishonour memo meticulously.- Challenge arbitrary blocks via banking ombudsman or writs.- Leverage presumptions under Sections 118/139. Natarajan VS Marappa Gounder - 2004 Supreme(Mad) 1218
For Drawers (Accused):- Prove block's legitimacy and non-liability (e.g., no debt via evidence).- Avoid issuing from restricted accounts.- Seek unblock or alternate payment promptly.
In crossed cheque suits, even a/c payee only markings don't bar summary proceedings under Order XXXVII CPC, affirming broad negotiable instrument scope. TAILORS PRIYA, A FIRM VS GULABCHAND DANRAJ, A FIRM - 1962 Supreme(Cal) 168
Ultimately, while blocks serve systemic protection, they don't override NI Act obligations. Courts may lift undue restrictions in proceedings. Gopal Singh vs Hira Lal (since deceased) through LRs - 2025 0 Supreme(HP) 294 For tailored advice, engage legal experts—outcomes hinge on facts.
Sources:Gopal Singh vs Hira Lal (since deceased) through LRs - 2025 0 Supreme(HP) 294INDERCHAND s/o LAKHICHAND KHIVSAR VS GOKUL s/o PITAMBAR PATIL - Dishonour Of Cheque (2006)Madan Govardhandas Goenka VS Union of India & another - 2003 0 Supreme(Bom) 537Shiv Kumar Sharma VS State of U. P. - 2023 Supreme(All) 555Jayalal C. D. @ Chandran VS State Of Kerala - 2023 Supreme(Ker) 678Sri Dattatraya VS Sharanappa - 2024 5 Supreme 671Gopi Ram Jain VS Attar Singh - 2019 Supreme(P&H) 368Gopi Ram Jain VS Attar SinghTAILORS PRIYA, A FIRM VS GULABCHAND DANRAJ, A FIRM - 1962 Supreme(Cal) 168
#ChequeBounce #NIACT #AccountBlocked
reason ‘Account Frozen’. ... The complainant asserted that the cheque was dishonoured with an endorsement ‘account blocked’. Memo of dishonour (Ext. C-2) mentions a reason to dishonour as ‘account blocked’. It was laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Mandvi Cooperative Bank Ltd. v. Nimesh B. ... The object of Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act is to infuse credibility into negotiable instruments, including cheques, a....
More over, the cheque was returned only for the reason of "account blocked" by the Bank and it was not returned for the reason funds insufficient. Even on the said date i.e. 21.04.2017, a sum of Rs.14 lakhs was in the account of the petitioners. ... Thereafter, when the respondent presented the said cheque for collection in his bank namely State Bank of Mysore, Gobichettipalayam on 21.04.2017, the cheque was returned for the reason that the account of the 2nd petition....
Act, unless the contrary is proved, it is to be presumed that the negotiable instruments (including a cheque) had been made or drawn for consideration. ... : Where one person signs and delivers to another a paper stamped in accordance with law relating to negotiable instruments then in force in India, and either wholly blank or having written thereon an in complete negotiable instrument, he thereby gives prima facie authority to the holder thereof to make ... Instruments (hereinafter r....
S.139 of the Act is an example of a reverse onus clause that has been included in furtherance of the legislative objective of improving the credibility of negotiable instruments. ... Presumptions as to negotiable instruments–Until the contrary is proved, the following presumptions shall be made;- (a) of consideration-that every negotiable instrument was made or drawn for consideration, and that every such instrument, when it has been accepted, indorsed, negotiated ... Japahari (supra) has held that, eve....
Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. ... Presumptions as to negotiable instruments - Until the contrary is proved, the following presumptions shall be made: (a) of consideration: that every negotiable instrument was made or drawn for consideration, and that every such instrument, when it has been accepted, indorsed ... The underlying object of such deliberate placement is to inject and enhance credibility of negotiable instruments. Additionally, the reverse onus claus....
Act"), as enacted by the Banking, Public Financial Institutions and Negotiable Instruments Laws (Amendment) Act, 1988, is under challenge in this bunch of six writ petitions. ... It was further held in the said judgment that the impugned provisions would come well within a larger ambit of the entries and it is connected with negotiable instruments, which clearly come within the aforesaid entries dealing with legislative power. ... ... 7 It may be observed that S.138 to 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, were....
Section 139 of the Act is an example of a reverse onus clause that has been included in furtherance of the legislative objective of improving the credibility of negotiable instruments. ... Regarding other submissions of maintainability of complaint, it is clear that it was well known to the applicant that the Bank account was blocked in the year 2017 itself and he issued the cheque on 24.03.2021 having knowledge that the account was not being maintained by the applicant, thus he cannot ... ’, thus, the ....
At the time of the devaluation the assessee's accounts with the the correspondent-backs in foreign countries stood credited with the sale proceeds of negotiable instruments and foreign currencies, as mentioned above. ... The assessee is a banking company and, as part of its banking business, has been purchasing cheques, payment orders, mail transfers, demand drafts, bills and other negotiable instruments drawn in foreign currencies and, sometimes, foreign currencies themselves from its clients. ... Their Lordships observ....
It was pointed out that the Chief Judge and the Judges of the City Civil Court have been empowered to try suits on negotiable instruments, and that a point arose as to whether cheques crossed with the words "a/c payee only", came within the meaning of the term "negotiable instruments". ... The first is "whether a cheque, crossed 'account Payee only' is a negotiable instrument", the second "whether a suit, on such a cheque, is a suit....
It was pointed out that the Chief Judge and the Judges of the City Civil Court have been empowered to try suits on negotiable instruments, and that a point arose as to whether cheques crossed with the words "a/c payee only", came within the meaning of the term "negotiable instruments". ... The first is "whether a cheque, crossed 'account Payee only" is a negotiable instrument", the second "whether a suit, on such a cheque, is a suit....
1. Whether the provisions of section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act have been made out for the purpose of the prosecution of the petitioners? 2. Whether oral agreements have been substituted with contract of sale? In this case, following points have arisen for discussion : -
In this case, following points have arisen for discussion:— Act have been made out for the purpose of the prosecution of the petitioners? 2. Whether oral agreements have been substituted with contract of sale? 1. Whether the provisions of Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments
(2) Whether offence u/s 138 of I Negotiable Instruments
Act could be drawn in favour of the plaintiff in the facts and circumstances. Whether the presumption under Section 118 of the Negotiable Instruments
Whether the provisions of Sec.59 of the Negotiable Instruments The learned counsel mainly argued that Sec.9 of the Negotiable Instruments
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
