Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
The courts emphasize that failure to pay the balance court fee within the extended time can lead to rejection of the suit or appeal, but such rejection can sometimes be set aside if the applicant demonstrates valid reasons and the court is convinced ["Thamarath Apputty VS Payyanakkottummal Ragini - Kerala"], ["ANAS P.J. Vs K.K.SWAMINATHAN AND OTHERS - Kerala"].
Analysis and Conclusion:
References:- ["Baby VS Chandramathy - 2023 0 Supreme(Ker) 917"]- ["ANAS P.J. Vs K.K.SWAMINATHAN AND OTHERS - Kerala"]- ["ANAS P.J. Vs K.K.SWAMINATHAN AND OTHERS - Kerala"]- ["Baby VS Chandramathy - 2023 0 Supreme(Ker) 917"]- ["V. K. Baburaj VS Roads and Bridges Development Corporation of Kerala Limited - 2016 0 Supreme(Ker) 930"]- ["ANAS P.J. Vs K.K.SWAMINATHAN AND OTHERS - Kerala"]- ["Elizabeth VS Francis - Kerala"]- ["ANAS P.J. Vs K.K.SWAMINATHAN AND OTHERS - Kerala"]- ["Rahmath VS Abdulkhader - Kerala"]- ["ANAS P.J. Vs K.K.SWAMINATHAN AND OTHERS - Kerala"]- ["Thamarath Apputty VS Payyanakkottummal Ragini - Kerala"]- ["SAM T. GEORGE vs MATHEWS T. GEORGE - Kerala"]- ["Orbit Projects Pvt. Ltd. VS Alankar Financial Services Pvt. Ltd. - Calcutta"]- ["State of Kerala VS Umesh Rao - Kerala"]- ["TOMSON JOSE Vs MERLY - Kerala"]- ["Brij Mohan Sharma VS Rajeev Kumar - Punjab and Haryana"]- ["RAJENDRAN vs PRADEEP - Kerala"]
In civil litigation under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC), timely payment of court fees is crucial to avoid dismissal of plaints or invalidation of auction sales. A common query among litigants is: what is the prescribed time for remitting balance court fee in CPC? Generally, this revolves around a strict 15-day window, particularly in execution proceedings, but nuances exist depending on the context—such as execution sales or deficit fees in suits. This post breaks down the rules, timelines, extensions, and judicial interpretations to help you navigate this essential aspect.
Note: This is general information based on legal precedents and not specific legal advice. Consult a qualified lawyer for your case.
Court fees fund judicial proceedings and are governed by the Court Fees Act, 1870, alongside CPC provisions. Balance court fee typically refers to the remaining amount after an initial deposit, such as:
Failure to remit on time can lead to severe consequences, like sale invalidation or plaint rejection under Order VII Rule 11 CPC. Sennan VS Shoba - 2010 0 Supreme(Mad) 5475
In execution of decrees involving property auctions, Order XXI Rules 84 and 85 CPC set mandatory timelines:
The Supreme Court has repeatedly emphasized these as mandatory provisions. In Manilal Mohanlal Shah v. Sardar Sayed Ahmed Sayed Mahammad (AIR 1954 SC 349), it held that non-compliance renders the sale null and void. Baby VS Chandramathy - 2023 0 Supreme(Ker) 917
Key points:- Default period: 15 days from sale date.- No automatic extensions; strict adherence required unless court-ordered. Baby VS Chandramathy - 2023 0 Supreme(Ker) 917- Courts cannot routinely extend statutory periods under Section 148 CPC if not fixed by them initially. Suraj Singh VS Rajnarain Lal - 1983 0 Supreme(Pat) 260V. K. Baburaj VS Roads and Bridges Development Corporation of Kerala Limited - 2016 0 Supreme(Ker) 930
While timelines are rigid, courts have limited discretion:
The Supreme Court clarifies: Courts can extend time only when the period is fixed by the court itself, not statutory mandates. Suraj Singh VS Rajnarain Lal - 1983 0 Supreme(Pat) 260 Non-deposit within 15 days typically invalidates the sale. Baby VS Chandramathy - 2023 0 Supreme(Ker) 917
Courts occasionally grant relief in exceptional cases:
In a Kerala High Court case, the appellant paid only 1/10th court fee initially but faced rejection due to business downturns. The court stressed proving indigence under Order XXXIII Rule 1 CPC, noting assets disqualify pauper status. K VIJAYAKUMAR vs K S SAROJINI AMMA - 2009 Supreme(Online)(KER) 26493
Another ruling affirmed trial courts' refusal of late payments beyond prescribed time, but highlighted legislative empowerment for extensions when fixed by court. Raju Thomas and Others v. Devu and Others - 2019 Supreme(Online)(SC) 2883
Under Kerala Court Fees Act Section 4A and Section 149 CPC, extensions were granted for medical hardships: The petitioner is granted time until 30.9.2016 to remit the balance court fee. V K BABURAJ vs ROADS AND BRIDGES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF KERALA LIMITED - 2016 Supreme(Online)(KER) 24444
Courts must provide reasoned orders for rejections and exercise leniency: In the fitness of things the court below should have leniently exercised its discretion. K.A.NAZAR vs M/S.COCHIN BEARING CENTRE - 2012 Supreme(Online)(KER) 35416
Review of plaint dismissals is possible if sufficient reason for delay exists, restoring the plaint upon payment. J.P.DHANYA & ANOTHER vs LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA - 2012 Supreme(Online)(KER) 7383
Usual practice favors litigants absent mala fides: It is the usual practice of the court to use this discretion in favour of the litigating parties unless there are manifest grounds of mala fide. Murlidhar (died) through Lrs. VS Ramlal S/o. Krishnachand - 2021 Supreme(Chh) 7Ravani Ceramics VS Marshal MFG. & Exports - 2018 Supreme(Guj) 1213Kausilya Bai, daughter of Late Chamru Ram VS Jeevanlal, son of Dujram - 2016 Supreme(Chh) 528
In one appeal, courts were directed to grant time for correcting valuation and fees before dismissal. Murlidhar (died) through Lrs. VS Ramlal S/o. Krishnachand - 2021 Supreme(Chh) 7
Extensions post-limitation require notice to opponents. C. Badrinarayanan VS Sel Jegat Printers (P) Limited - 2019 Supreme(Mad) 2786
These cases illustrate that while 15 days is standard (e.g., post-issue framing under Order VII Rule 11 with Kerala Act), discretion under Sections 148/149 CPC allows flexibility with justification. ANAS P.J. Vs K.K.SWAMINATHAN AND OTHERS - 2008 Supreme(Online)(KER) 21238
Beyond executions, in suits:
To avoid pitfalls:- Deposit promptly: Aim for full payment within 15 days. Sennan VS Shoba - 2010 0 Supreme(Mad) 5475- Seek extensions early: File applications with evidence (e.g., medical certificates, financial proofs) before expiry.- Prove sufficient cause: Mala fides or concealment can doom requests. Kausilya Bai, daughter of Late Chamru Ram VS Jeevanlal, son of Dujram - 2016 Supreme(Chh) 528- Notice requirements: Ensure opponents are heard for post-limitation extensions. C. Badrinarayanan VS Sel Jegat Printers (P) Limited - 2019 Supreme(Mad) 2786
Courts lean towards justice, providing opportunities unless prejudice is evident.
In conclusion, the prescribed time for remitting balance court fee under CPC is typically 15 days from the relevant event, such as sale date or issue framing, unless validly extended. Staying informed on these timelines can safeguard your proceedings. For tailored guidance, reach out to a legal expert.
#CPCLaw #CourtFeeIndia #LegalGuide
Coming to appeals; Order XLI Rule 3 deals with rejection of appeal, when the memorandum of appeal not drawn up as prescribed under Order XLI Rule 1 and 2 of the CPC. But the said provision does not permit rejection of appeal for non-payment of balance court fee. ... the appellant to pay balance court fee is rejection of the appeal and the said rejection of appeal is decree, as defined under Section 2(2) of CPC. ... None of the provi....
The Court Fee payable is Rs.1,14,.400/- The appellant paid 1/10th Court fee at Rs.11,440/- According to the appellant, by the time the appellant was to pay the balance court fee, his business had fallen on bad times and he could not pay the balance court fee. ... Further, it is noted that the appellant, it was after filing the application for exempting him from remitting the #HL_....
When the respondent/defendant filed written statement contesting the plaint, issues were framed by the court and therefore the appellant was obliged to remit the balance court fees within the time prescribed or the extended time. ... That apart, when sufficient reasons are furnished, the court has to consider the request on its merits; since power for enlargement of time for remitting balance court#HL_END....
By the impugned judgment, the High Court has affirmed the trial court's refusal to accept the balance amount of court fee offered by the appellants - plaintiffs, being beyond the time prescribed by law. ... This is more so, as the legislation referred to by the learned counsel for the respondents empowers the court to extend the time of deposit of court fee otherwise prescribed by it. We order acc....
Since the petitioner could not pay the amount within the extended time of one month provided under Section 4A of the Kerala Court Fees and Suit Valuation Act, he filed Ext.P2 petition for enlargement of three months for remitting the balance court fee and produced Ext.P3 medical certificate to show that ... If the petitioner remits the balance court fee within that time, court below is directed to....
The petitioner is granted time till 30.9.2016 to remit the balance court fee. If the petitioner remits the balance court fee within that time, court below is directed to receive the same and proceed with the suit and dispose of the same in accordance with law. ... Since the petitioner could not pay the amount within the extended time of one month provided under Section 4A of the Kerala Court Fees ....
Viswanatha Iyer is as to this Court's confines of power and jurisdiction to extend the time for remitting the 2/3rds of the court fee payable after the admission of appeals. ... But since S.149 of the C.P.C. is a specific provision which gives the court wide power to extend time for adequate reasons, it is not at all difficult to invoke that power in the matter of extension of time for the payment of balance court ....
The appellant herein instituted the suit after remitting 1/10th of the court fee. Issues were settled on 8/8/2007. ... It is true that going by the provisions contained in Order 7 Rule 11 of the C.P.C. read with the relevant provisions of the Kerala Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, he ought to pay the balance court fee within a period of 15 days, after framing of the issues. ... The petitioner/appellant in this case filed an application seeking ex....
One tenth of the court fee has been paid along with the plaint by the petitioner. As the petitioner failed to pay the balance court fee of Rs.11,736/- in time, the plaint was rejected on 2.2.2008. ... The learned counsel for the revision petitioner submits that he was prevented by sufficient reason from remitting the court fee in time which lead to the rejection of his claim. ... The petitioner after remi....
On that date they filed I.A.No.2216/2009 seeking one month's time for remitting the balance court fee. The court below dismissed the said application. Consequently the plaint itself was rejected for non payment of the balance court fee. ... Rs.39,000/- and odd was the balance court fee payable. In the fitness of things the court below should have leniently exerc....
It is the claim of the appellant that he was unable to pay the requisite amount of court fee due to financial difficulties. In the present case, the appellant filed an application for extension of time for remitting the balance court fee which was rejected by the learned Sub-Judge. It is also a usual practice that the court provides an opportunity to the party to pay court fee within a stipulated time on failure of which the court dismisses the appeal. It is the usual practice of the court to use this discretion in favour of the litigating parties unless there are manifest ....
The balance of the Court fee was sought to be paid after seeking for extension of time by fling an application under Section 149 CPC and that the Court below has also granted 15 days time to pay the balance Court fee. This order has been complied with and the balance Court fee has also been paid and therefore, the learned Counsel submitted that there is no ground to interfere with the order passed by the Court below. 8. The learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents submitted that the suit was filed within the period of limitation and a portion of the Court fee ....
It is also a usual practice that the Court provides an opportunity to the party to pay court fee within a stipulated time on failure of which the Court dismisses the appeal. It is the claim of the appellant that he was unable to pay the requisite amount of court fee due to financial difficulties. It is the usual practice of the court to use this discretion in favour of the litigating parties unless there are manifest grounds of mala fide. In the present case, the appellant filed an application for extension of time for remitting the balance court fee which was rejected by the learn....
In this case even in the review petition, reason stated was that date was wrongly taken for remitting the balance court fee and that was the reason for non-payment of balance court fee within time. So in such circumstances the order passed by the court below dismissing the application to review the judgment is unsustainable in law and the same is liable to be set aside. The question as to whether the court has power to extend the time beyond the period mentioned in Section 4A of the Act has been considered by a Division Bench of this Court in Shajahan v. Kamala Narayanan (....
It is the usual practise of the court to use this discretion in favour of the litigating parties unless there are manifest grounds of mala fides. It is also a usual practise that the court provides an opportunity to the party to pay court fee within a stipulated time on failure of which the court dismisses the appeal. It is the claim of the appellant that he was unable to pay the requisite amount of court fee due to financial difficulties. In the present case, the appellant filed an application for extension of time for remitting the balance court fee which was rejected by the lear....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
