Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
The provisional assessment order must be followed by a final order within 30 days, or it becomes invalid ["Assistant Executive Engineer Electrical Sub Division, Kse Board LTD. VS Arun R. Chandran - Kerala"]
Legal Implication of Delay If the final bill is issued after 30 days of the provisional assessment, it generally contravenes Section 126(3), which mandates passing the final assessment within the specified period. Such delays can invalidate the final bill, as courts have set aside assessments made beyond this period:
Assessment made beyond 30 days is not valid and can be quashed ["DAKSHIN GUJARAT VIJ COMPANY LIMITED VS MANUBHAI DEVABHAI AAHIR - 2022 0 Supreme(Guj) 1474"]
Appeal Process and Remedies Consumers can file appeals under Section 127 after the final order, but only if the final bill is issued within the prescribed period. If the final bill is delayed, the right to appeal may be compromised or the assessment challenged:
Analysis and Conclusion:Based on the legal provisions and case law, the final bill under Section 126 of the Electricity Act, 2003, cannot be legally sent after 30 days from the provisional assessment. Issuance beyond this period typically results in the assessment being invalid, and the consumer has grounds to challenge or quash the bill. The law emphasizes strict adherence to the 30-day timeline for passing the final order, ensuring procedural fairness and legal compliance.
Receiving a provisional bill for unauthorized use of electricity can be stressful for consumers and businesses alike. But what happens next? A common question arises: can the final bill be sent after 30 days of the provisional bill under Electricity Act Section 126? This post dives into the legal framework, timelines, judicial interpretations, and practical implications under the Electricity Act, 2003, to help you understand your rights and obligations.
We'll explore the strict procedural requirements, supported by case law, and integrate insights from related judgments on unauthorized use and assessments. Note: This is general information based on legal precedents and not specific legal advice. Consult a qualified lawyer for your situation.
Section 126 addresses unauthorized use of electricity, which includes scenarios like using electricity in premises not covered by the original connection, exceeding authorized load, or tampering with meters. M/S. GANAPATI ROLLER FLOUR MILLS vs ASSAM POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LTD. AND ANR. - 2025 Supreme(Online)(GAU) 826 When an inspector detects such use, they issue a provisional assessment order or bill. This is followed by a final assessment order.
The process is quasi-judicial, emphasizing fairness and timeliness. Key steps include:- Serving the provisional bill immediately after inspection.- Allowing the consumer to raise objections.- Issuing the final bill based on the assessment.
However, the law imposes a mandatory 30-day timeline for the final bill from the date of the provisional bill. DAKSHIN GUJARAT VIJ COMPANY LIMITED VS MANUBHAI DEVABHAI AAHIR - 2022 0 Supreme(Guj) 1474 Failure to comply can render the final assessment invalid.
Under Section 126, the final assessment or bill must be issued within 30 days of the provisional bill. This is not a mere guideline but a statutory mandate. Deputy Engineer (O&M) - Dakshin Gujarat Vij Company Limited VS Dilipkumar P. Mistry - 2023 0 Supreme(Guj) 183 Courts have consistently held that exceeding this period makes the order procedurally irregular and liable to be quashed.
For instance, in one judgment, the court explicitly recognized: the assessment order must be passed within 30 days of the provisional bill. The failure to do so results in the assessment being invalid. Deputy Engineer (O&M) - Dakshin Gujarat Vij Company Limited VS Dilipkumar P. Mistry - 2023 0 Supreme(Guj) 183 Similarly, another ruling stressed that the process is subject to strict procedural timelines, and non-compliance vitiates the order. DAKSHIN GUJARAT VIJ COMPANY LIMITED VS MANUBHAI DEVABHAI AAHIR - 2022 0 Supreme(Guj) 1474
This timeline ensures consumers aren't left in limbo and prevents arbitrary delays by electricity suppliers. In a case where the representation was invited on 14.11.2016 whereas the final bill was made on 28.11.2016 beyond a period of 30 days from the date of the provisional assessment, it was deemed a breach of sub-section 3 of Section 126. DEPUTY ENGINEER ( O AND M) V/s M/S DELIGHT BAKERS - 2022 Supreme(Online)(Guj) 1554
Indian courts have reinforced the 30-day rule through various precedents:
Core Precedent on Timelines: The judgment in Deputy Engineer (O&M) - Dakshin Gujarat Vij Company Limited VS Dilipkumar P. Mistry - 2023 0 Supreme(Guj) 183 held that delay beyond 30 days invalidates the assessment, making it liable to be set aside. The court emphasized the purpose: to ensure fairness and avoid prejudice.
Quasi-Judicial Emphasis: In DAKSHIN GUJARAT VIJ COMPANY LIMITED VS MANUBHAI DEVABHAI AAHIR - 2022 0 Supreme(Guj) 1474, it was observed that the assessment process is quasi-judicial and subject to strict procedural timelines, failure of which vitiates the order.
Related cases provide context on unauthorized use:- Unauthorized use includes electricity in additional plots without separate connections, upholding provisional bills. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (O AND M) VS SHAH PAPER MILLS LTD. - 2024 Supreme(Guj) 1441 The court affirmed: use of electricity in premises not covered by the original connection, necessitating a separate application for supply.
In theft allegations, assessments under Section 126 still apply, with provisional bills leading to final orders appealable under Section 127. Shiv Alloys Steel VS Assam Power Distribution Company Limited - 2021 Supreme(Gau) 318 The assessment must be as per the Act, 2003 i.e. under section 126 of the Act, 2003.
Appeals require 50% deposit of the assessed amount, forming a complete code with Sections 126 and 127. Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution Company Limited VS Anil Kumar Agrawal, S/o. Shri Chandrasen Agrawal - 2022 Supreme(Chh) 495 No civil court jurisdiction typically interferes unless procedural lapses occur.
These rulings show courts prioritize compliance, often quashing delayed finals.
Are there any exceptions to the 30-day rule?- No Explicit Extensions: The Act doesn't provide for extensions unless amended or specifically granted. DAKSHIN GUJARAT VIJ COMPANY LIMITED VS MANUBHAI DEVABHAI AAHIR - 2022 0 Supreme(Guj) 1474- Exceptional Circumstances: Some judgments hint at rare cases, but strict adherence is the norm. For example, in consumer disputes, failure to produce the provisional order itself weakens the supplier's case. Krishna Murari VS North Bihar Power Distribution Co. Ltd.
In power theft under Section 135, provisional bills differ slightly, but Section 126 timelines generally apply for assessments. S. S. R. Sponge Iron Limited (now known as Vrajraj Ispat Limited) VS Jharkhand Urja Vikas Nigam Limited - 2015 Supreme(Jhk) 679
Consumers can challenge via appeal under Section 127 or writ petitions if timelines are breached. Union Bank of India VS Deputy Chief Engineer, Kerala State Electricity Board - 2023 Supreme(Ker) 570
Real-world example: In a case of excess load usage, the absence of a provisional order led to dismissal of the bill claim. Krishna Murari VS North Bihar Power Distribution Co. Ltd. If the disputed electricity bill has been raised on the basis of provisional assessment there has to be a provisional assessment order.
Section 126(6)(b)(v) defines unauthorized use broadly, including exceeding authorized supply. Union Bank of India VS Deputy Chief Engineer, Kerala State Electricity Board - 2023 Supreme(Ker) 570 Cases like unauthorized power transfer between adjacent premises have been contested, with courts examining site maps and permissions. Executive Engineer (O & M) VS Amul Crankshaft Pvt. Ltd. Unit-2b - 2020 Supreme(Guj) 414
Tariff disputes, e.g., bakery vs. restaurant misuse, further highlight scrutiny. Noushad T. C. VS Kerala State Electricity Board - 2015 Supreme(Ker) 1393
In conclusion, while the Electricity Act aims to curb misuse, procedural timelines like the 30-day rule protect consumers. Stay informed, act swiftly, and consult professionals for disputes. For more on electricity laws, explore our related posts.
References:1. Deputy Engineer (O&M) - Dakshin Gujarat Vij Company Limited VS Dilipkumar P. Mistry - 2023 0 Supreme(Guj) 1832. DAKSHIN GUJARAT VIJ COMPANY LIMITED VS MANUBHAI DEVABHAI AAHIR - 2022 0 Supreme(Guj) 14743. DEPUTY ENGINEER ( O AND M) V/s M/S DELIGHT BAKERS - 2022 Supreme(Online)(Guj) 15544. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (O AND M) VS SHAH PAPER MILLS LTD. - 2024 Supreme(Guj) 1441
This analysis draws from established case law to provide clarity—always verify with current statutes.
#ElectricityAct126, #ProvisionalBill, #UnauthorizedUse
Section 126 of the Electricity Act, 2003. ... made under section 126 of the Electricity Act, 2003. ... 126 of the Electricity Act or to initiate any Criminal Proceeding within the meaning of Section 135 of the Electricity Act. ... However, the petitioner may file an appeal against the impugned final assessment order and #HL_ST....
(A) Electricity Act, 2003 - Section 126 - Disciplinary proceedings against a Sub Engineer for delay in issuing ... Obviously the assessment bill should have been served within 30 days on or before 17.09.2011 after giving an opportunity to the party/person to file objections, if any, against the provisional assessment, before the order of final assessment is passed. ... Failed to issue final bill to Consumer No.3367. 5. Your above la....
Constitution of India, 1950 - Articles 226, 227 - Electricity Act, 2003 - Section 126, 135 - Theft of electricity ... 126 of Act - Held, Evidently and admittedly this issuance of final bill was not within period of 30 days as provided in Section ... of Section 126 of Act ought to be interfered with and quashed and set aside - Accordingly even on account of sole reason that bill ... Evidently and admittedly this issuance of final bill was not within t....
(A) Electricity Act, 2003 - Section 126 and 127 - Provisional assessment and appeal - Petitioner challenged the validity of the VCR ... A perusal of Section 127 of the Act of 2003 will reveal that the prerequisite for entertaining of an appeal is that the 50% of the assessed amount is deposited as also the person aggrieved should prefer appeal within 30 days of the said final order passed under Section 126 of the Act#HL_EN....
126(6) of the Electricity Act. ... 126(6) of the Electricity Act, affirming the provisional bill issued by the appellant. ... 126, emphasizing the necessity of legal permission for electricity use in premises not covered by the original connection, influencing ... of the Electricity Act, 2003, specifically Section 126 of the said Act. ... However, overlooking the submission made by the respondent, a final bill came....
The representation was invited on 14.11.2016 whereas the final bill was made on 28.11.2016 beyond a period of 30 days from the date of the provisional assessment. This in the perception of the appellate authority was in breach of sub-section 3 of Section 126 of the Electricity Act, 2003. ... Reading sub-section 3 of Section 126 of the Electricity#HL_EN....
The court emphasized the necessity of compliance with procedural requirements under Section 126 of the Act for issuing such bills ... The court also emphasized the importance of following procedural requirements under Section 126 of the Act for issuing assessment ... barred by limitation under Section 56(2) of the Electricity Act, 2003 (for short, “the Act”). ... the consumer, and the consumer has to be permitted to file objections against the #HL_ST....
Ratio Decidendi: The court analyzed Section 126 of the Electricity Act, which provides for provisional assessment ... terms of the provisions of Section 126 of the Act, 2003 r/w regulation 50 of the supply code, 2005. ... It is also clear from Section 126(6)(b)(v) of the Act, 2003 that if electricity is used exceeding the authorized supply, it is an unauthorized use. ... To have a clear picture of the said contention raised by the ....
Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 - Section 22, D - Electricity Act, 2003 - Section 126, (2),(3), (4) ... 126(5) of Electricity Act - In case of Metaldyne Industries Ltd. ... 126 and 127 of Electricity Act constitute a complete code in itself and there is remedy of appeal against final assessment order ... It appears from the documents that the respondent never raised any objection to the provisional assessment, particularly within the period of 30 days as stipulat....
... ... Findings of Court: ... The assessment made under Section 126 based on the inspections was found valid, affirming jurisdiction ... ... ... Ratio Decidendi: The Court emphasized that unauthorized use under Section 126 is distinct from theft under Section 135, allowing ... 126, despite allegations of theft, and the petitioner failed to substantiate wrongful conduct on part of the Respondent. ... It is the further case of the petitioner that on 08.12.2021, a provisional assessm....
Whether the tampering was with dishonest intention or not amounting to theft that part is left open to be decided by the Special Court. The assessment must be as per the Act, 2003 i.e. under section 126 of the Act, 2003 as the Act has no other provision for assessment other than Section 126. Though Section 126 covers provisional bill raised due to “unauthorized use of electricity” and even after it is assumed that theft of electricity also falls within the definition of “unauthorized use of electricity” however, the final bill under Sub-Section (3) of Section 126 of the Act, 2003 a....
It is submitted that the objections against the respondent No.1 was of use of electricity in another premises other than the premises for which authorized connection was given. Aggrieved by the aforesaid final assessment of supplementary bill, the respondent No.1 preferred an appeal under Section 127 of the Electricity Act by making payment of Rs.26,03,417/- being 50% of the bill amount. This amounts to unauthorized use of electricity by respondent No.1. 2.1. Pursuant to the checking, provisional bill dated 29.08.2011 by invoking Section 126 of the Electricity Act was issued for an....
Therefore, provisional assessment of electricity charges was done under Section 126 of the Electricity Act and the disputed bill was raised. The case of the opposite party is that in the inspection done in April, 2014, the complainant was found using excess load of 4 Kw as against the sanctioned load of 1 Kw. The opposite party has failed to produce the provisional assessment order in evidence. We do not find merit in the above contention of the opposite party because if the disputed electricity bill has been raised on the basis of provisional assessment there has to be a p....
The present case is an act of vendetta by the respondents. Percontra, Mr. Ajit Kumar, the learned Senior counsel for the respondent Jharkhand Urja Vikas Nigam Limited submits that there is no provision for affording an opportunity of hearing to the consumer when a provisional assessment in terms of third proviso to Section 135 (1A) is made. The learned Senior counsel disputes that in W.P.(C) No. 2638 of 2012 this Court quashed the bill raised by the Jharkhand State Electricity Board. It is further submitted that the provisional bill in terms of third proviso to Section 135 (1A) of ....
The petitioner though filed Ext. P5 appeal under Section 127 of the Act to the second respondent did not prosecute the same allegedly being unable to make the statutory deposit of one half of the amount assessed. It is under these circumstances has the present writ petition been filed seeking to quash Ext. The petitioner filed Ext. P3 objection thereto contending that he is using the premises for bakery business only and that penalty if at all could only be on LT IV tariff. The second respondent however confirmed the provisional bill by Ext. P4 order in terms of Section 126 of the ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
