Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
DE SILVA v. NONOHAMY et al.
,AMARASURIYA v. RAMANATHAN CHETTIAR
, 2022 Supreme(Online)(KER) 3903, 2023 Supreme(Online)(KER) 32294).The extent and width of the right of way can be subject to dispute; courts examine the nature of use, documentary evidence, and witness testimonies to determine the scope (2023 0 Supreme(Ker) 187, 2024 0 Supreme(Kar) 254).
Analysis and Conclusion:
Imagine needing to access your property via a pathway that crosses through the lands of two different neighbors—one used occasionally for quick trips, the other more continuously for daily needs. Can you legally claim a 'right of way'? The question at hand is: The Right of a Man in a Way Passes through Two Different Persons Properties Uses Occasionally and Continuously.
This scenario raises critical issues under Indian property law, particularly the . Property owners often face disputes over pathways, especially when they span multiple parcels. Understanding easements—rights to use another's land for specific purposes—is essential. This post breaks down the legal principles, evidence requirements, and real-world applications, drawing from judicial precedents. Note: This is general information, not specific legal advice. Consult a qualified lawyer for your situation.
An easement grants the owner or occupier of one piece of land (the ) the right to use or restrict use of another's land (the ) for the beneficial enjoyment of their own property. As defined legally, it is a right that the owner or occupier of certain land possesses for the beneficial enjoyment of that land, allowing them to do something or prevent something from being done on another's land 2018 0 Supreme(Ker) 29.
Easements can arise by grant, necessity, or prescription. When a pathway crosses two separate properties, claimants must prove rights over each individually, though actions can sometimes proceed against key owners
.
Most claims like this rely on prescriptive easements, acquired through long, uninterrupted use. To succeed, you typically need:- Continuous and uninterrupted use for the statutory period—usually 20 years under .- Use '': Open, peaceful, and without the servient owner's permission 2004 8 Supreme 398 2023 0 Supreme(Ker) 187.
Mere occasional or permissive use won't suffice. For instance, long-term use of a pathway does not automatically confer a right if such use was not intended to be as a matter of right. Users must demonstrate that their use was not merely permissive or casual 2021 0 Supreme(SC) 24 2022 0 Supreme(Ker) 123.
In cases spanning multiple properties, require intervening lands to be subject to servitude, unlike urban ones where separation is possible
.
Courts demand clear proof of the pathway's existence, width, and use. In one key case, the plaintiff failed because they couldn't show a 2.75-meter-wide way was in continuous use; evidence pointed only to a footpath at partition time 2023 0 Supreme(Ker) 187. The absence of proof for open, continuous use doomed the claim 2012 7 Supreme 289.
Key evidence tips:- Historical photos, witness testimonies, or revenue records showing use over 20+ years.- Details on width and nature—e.g., cartway vs. footpath.- Proof against permissive use, like no objections raised despite visibility.
Excessive use beyond passing and re-passing can constitute : If a man uses a land over which there is a right of way for any purpose lawful or unlawful other than th... 2019 0 Supreme(Mad) 1036.
If the pathway was a (enjoyed before property division), it may continue if necessary for enjoyment as before partition. However, plead this explicitly—failure to do so weakens the case 2023 0 Supreme(Ker) 187.
Partition of the complicates matters. Under , divided owners share the easement but cannot substantially burden the servient land. A right of easement cannot be claimed on a public pathway, but a right of easement can be claimed on a , subject to the provisions of 1996 0 Supreme(All) 568. Each co-owner post-partition can't claim separate passages that increase the burden.
For bhumidhari lands (under UP Consolidation laws), suits declaring pathways public may be barred post-consolidation 1996 0 Supreme(All) 568.
When the right of way passes over several contiguous lands, suits can target owners of the claimed tenements without necessarily joining all: A fortiori, it may be established in an action to which the owner or owners of the over which the right is claimed are parties without bringing in the owners of the other servient tenements...
.
Rural vs. urban distinctions matter: An , for instance, may subsist though the two-tenements are separated by intervening properties which are free from servitude but this cannot be the case with respect to ...
.
Servient owners often argue:- Use was permissive (e.g., neighborly allowance).- Pathway was public, negating private easement needs.- Insufficient continuity or openness.
Claimants must counter with robust evidence. In partition cases, pre-division use as strengthens positions, but post-partition claims must respect Section 30 limits 1996 0 Supreme(All) 568.
To bolster your claim:- Document everything: Maintain records of use from day one.- Plead comprehensively: Include prescriptive, , and necessity grounds.- Gather witnesses: Long-term residents can testify to '' use.- Survey the path: Prove exact dimensions and location.- Negotiate first: Grants or licenses avoid litigation.
Always check local laws, like consolidation acts in UP, which may bar certain suits 1996 0 Supreme(All) 568.
Claiming a right of way through two different properties in India generally hinges on proving a via 20 years of continuous, open, peaceful use 2004 8 Supreme 398 2023 0 Supreme(Ker) 187. Failures often stem from weak evidence on width, continuity, or non-permissive nature 2023 0 Supreme(Ker) 187 2012 7 Supreme 289. Quasi-easements offer alternatives in partition contexts, but Section 30 prevents burden increases 1996 0 Supreme(All) 568.
Key Takeaways:- Evidence is paramount—vague claims fail.- Multiple properties require tailored proof per tenement.- Urban/rural distinctions and partition effects matter
1996 0 Supreme(All) 568.- Seek professional advice early to avoid costly denials.
References: 2004 8 Supreme 398 2012 7 Supreme 289 2021 0 Supreme(SC) 24 2023 0 Supreme(Ker) 187 2018 0 Supreme(Ker) 29
1996 0 Supreme(All) 568 2019 0 Supreme(Mad) 1036
This framework empowers property owners facing access disputes. Stay informed, document diligently, and protect your rights responsibly.
#RightOfWayIndia, #EasementLaw, #PropertyRights
4.According to the plaintiff, the suit properties were purchased by him under two sale deeds dated 20.07.1994 and 06.10.1984 respectively. ... 12.On the other hand, ''easement by prescription'' occurs when some one uses another person's property openly and continuously without permission for a legally defined period. This period varies by jurisdiction but often ranges from ten to twenty years. ... 11.An easement is the ....
![K. Ramasamy vs K. Ramasamy, [Died] - 2024 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 79295](https://supremetoday-s3.b-cdn.net/Madras_small_3.png)
to use the cart track instantly by way of easement by necessity after partition and subsequently by prescription, i.e., by way of continuously using it from 1965 onward. ... An easement being an appurtenance to the dominant tenement, passes with the property' and it cannot be destroyed or extinguished by a casual omission of a drafts man while drawing up a conveyance deed. ... It is relevant to read Secti....
The relevant pleading is in paragraph 10 of the plaint which reads thus :- “Plaintiff is in enjoyment of the plaint C schedule property as the way leading from Kuttiady-Thottilpalam road to his house and plaint A and B schedule properties as of right, peacefully, continuously ... Where immovable property passes by operation of law, the persons from and to whom it so passes#HL_....
, continuously, openly and uninterruptedly as of right as an easement for the last more than 34 years. ... Where immovable property passes by operation of law, the persons from and to whom it so passes are, for the purpose of this section, to be deemed, respectively, the transferor and transferee.” 15. ... The first appellate Court, but for saying that the right acqui....
In the meantime, it appears that the defendant had constructed two gates in the ‘C’ schedule property in order to regulate the entry of the persons into item no. 1 of ‘B’ schedule property. ... Transfer of dominant heritage passes easement. ... Answering the two questions in affirmative, it was held that merely because the settlement deed( in that case) did not mention the right to use the way#H....
properties touch one another. ... An urban servitude, for instance, may subsist though the two-tenements are separated by intervening properties which are free from servitude but this cannot be the case with respect to rural servitudes, which require that the intervening properties shall be subject to some servitude, though not necessarily ... Servitude-Right of cart way-Dominant....
In the meantime, it appears that the defendant had constructed two gates in the ‘C’ schedule property in order to regulate the entry of the persons into item no. 1 of ‘B’ schedule property. ... Transfer of dominant heritage passes easement. ... Answering the two questions in affirmative, it was held that merely because the settlement deed( in that case) did not mention the right to use the way#....
He also admits that the width of the road is 10 to 12 feet and heavy vehicle also passes through his land. ... The counsel for the appellant in his argument would vehemently contend that the suit was filed for the relief of right of way claiming easmentary right, declaration, permanent injunction and mandatory injunction. ... The defendant is the owner of the properties bearing Sy.Nos.322/6, 322/7 and tho....
A fortiori, it may be established in an action to which the owner or owners of the servient tenement over which the right is claimed are parties without bringing in the owners of the other servient tenements in a case where the right of way passes over several contiguous lands. ... The relevant parts of the judgment are as follows :- " The plaintiff in this action claims a right of way#HL_....
Where immovable property passes by operation of law, the persons from and to whom it so passes are, for the purpose of this section, to be deemed, respectively, the transferor and transferee. ... The plaintiff has been using the plaint 'B' schedule pathway continuously, openly and uninterruptedly from 1978 onwards and even prior to that period, the way was in existence. The plaintiff acquired the #HL_STA....
This bricked way passes through the grove and after two furlong, it merges into the metalled road. From the place of occurrence, she had gone to Itaunja from the place of occurrence through the way of her village via the ridge of fields.
So observed Crompton J. in -- ‘R. v. Pratt’, (1855) 4 El & Bl 860. In -- ‘Harrison v. Duke of Butland’, (1893) 1 Q B 142, Lopes L. J. observed; But whatever view be taken of the rights of the public they were limited to passing and re-passing and any excessive user was held to constitute trespass on the property rights of the person who owned the lands on either side of the road. “If a man uses a land over which there is a right of way for any purpose lawful or unlawful other than th....
The above two Rulings would emphasise the need to have the right man in the right place. In case of a Trust of this nature, if a trustee is permitted to act according to his whims and fancies, then it will lead to deplorable deterioration, thereby affecting the very object of the Trust.
An illustration under this Section made the position more clear. On the basis of this provision, the learned counsel for the appellant sub mitted that the right of way already con ceded in 1937 was for the undivided dominant heritage and only this right of way may be claimed by all the co-owners of the dominant heritage and each may not, on partition, lay a separate claim on the servant heritage, which is conceded would in crease the burden on the servant heritage. A house to which a....
He then went on to say that ownership of physical objects was a figure of speach. Ownership in its most comprehensive signification denotes the relation between a person and any right that is vested in him. That which a man owns in this sense is in all uses a right.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
