Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Scanned Judgements…!
Checking relevance for Kaushal Kishor VS State of Uttar Pradesh...
Kaushal Kishor VS State of Uttar Pradesh - 2023 0 Supreme(SC) 5 : The right to freedom of speech, as guaranteed under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution of India, means the right to free speech and to express opinions through various media such as by word of mouth, through the print or electronic media, through pictographs, writings, graphics or any other manner that can be discerned by the mind. It includes the freedom of press, propagation of ideas through publication and circulation, the right to seek information, and to acquire or impart ideas. The right encompasses every nature of expression that falls within the scope and ambit of free speech. This right is not absolute and may be subject to reasonable restrictions imposed by the State under Article 19(2) in the interests of sovereignty and integrity of India, security of the State, friendly relations with foreign States, public order, decency or morality, contempt of court, defamation, or incitement to an offence. The right is essential for a healthy democracy, enabling citizens to be well-informed about governance, debate policies, and contribute to societal development in an egalitarian manner.Checking relevance for In Re : Ramlila Maidan Incident Dt. 4/5. 06. 2011 VS Home Secretary, Union Of India...
In Re : Ramlila Maidan Incident Dt. 4/5. 06. 2011 VS Home Secretary, Union Of India - 2012 2 Supreme 36 : The right to freedom of speech and expression, as guaranteed under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution of India, is not absolute and is subject to reasonable restrictions. It includes the right to express one''''s views, opinions, and ideas, and is essential for the proper functioning of a democratic system. This right is considered the ''''mother of all other liberties'''' and plays a crucial role in the formation of public opinion on social, political, and economic matters. However, it can be restricted by the State in the interest of the security of the State, friendly relations with foreign states, public order, decency or morality, contempt of court, defamation, or incitement to an offence, as provided under Article 19(2). The restriction must be reasonable, not arbitrary, and must be in accordance with the procedure established by law. The right also encompasses the right to receive information and the right of the press.Checking relevance for Express Newspaper Private LTD. : Press Trust Of India, Indian National Press, Shri Kanayalal Nanabhai Desai, Hindustan Times LTD. , Loksatta Karyalaya, Sandesh LTD. , Jansatta Karyalaya: Express Newspaper Private LTD. VS Union Of India...
Express Newspaper Private LTD. : Press Trust Of India, Indian National Press, Shri Kanayalal Nanabhai Desai, Hindustan Times LTD. , Loksatta Karyalaya, Sandesh LTD. , Jansatta Karyalaya: Express Newspaper Private LTD. VS Union Of India - 1958 0 Supreme(SC) 26 : The right to freedom of speech and expression encompasses the freedom of the press and is recognized as a fundamental personal right. It rests on the assumption that the widest possible dissemination of information from diverse and antagonistic sources is essential to the welfare of the public. This freedom is foundational to free government by free people, and its purpose is to prevent public authorities from assuming a guardianship of the public mind through regulating the press, speech, and religion. The right also includes freedom from restriction in respect of employment in the editorial force, meaning individuals must have the liberty to work in or be employed by the press without undue interference.Checking relevance for Maneka Gandhi VS Union Of India...
Maneka Gandhi VS Union Of India - 1978 0 Supreme(SC) 29 : The right to freedom of speech and expression under Article 19(1)(a) of the Indian Constitution is exercisable not only within India but also outside its territory. It includes the right to seek, receive, and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers. This right is not geographically limited to India, as the Constitution does not impose such a restriction. The right extends to activities such as expressing oneself abroad, exchanging thoughts and ideas with others internationally, and communicating through media across borders. The Supreme Court has held that State action restricting or interfering with the right to go abroad may impair this freedom, especially when it prevents a citizen from expressing views or sharing ideas in foreign countries. The right is also connected to the broader concept of personal liberty under Article 21, and its exercise outside India is protected against arbitrary State interference. The right is not limited to speech within India but encompasses the full scope of expression, including travel abroad when necessary for such expression.Checking relevance for Subramanian Swamy VS Union of India, Ministry of Law...
Subramanian Swamy VS Union of India, Ministry of Law - 2016 3 Supreme 598 : Right to freedom of speech and expression is a fundamental right under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution of India. It is highly treasured and essential for democratic functioning, but it is not absolute. It is subject to reasonable restrictions imposed under Article 19(2), which include provisions such as defamation, incitement to an offence, and public order. The right is balanced against other fundamental rights, particularly the right to reputation protected under Article 21. While the right allows individuals to express views, even dissenting or disagreeing opinions, it does not permit defamation that harms another''''s reputation. The right cannot be used to undermine the dignity and reputation of others, as reputation is an inherent component of the right to life under Article 21. Therefore, the right to freedom of speech and expression must be exercised responsibly, respecting the rights of others, and is subject to legal restrictions that are reasonable, proportionate, and in the public interest.
