Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
In a recent case, the High Court discharged respondents (relatives of the respondent) in a domestic violence case due to the absence of specific acts of violence attributable to them, and highlighted that mere allegations without concrete proof are insufficient for their involvement ["2025 Supreme(Online)(Gau) 7908"].
Analysis and Conclusion:
cases under the () often extend to family members, but courts are increasingly scrutinizing vague allegations against distant relatives. A common question arises: in which latest case did a give discharge to respondents in a case for lack of involvement of relatives? This ruling highlights the boundaries of , protecting those without genuine ties to the or .
In this post, we delve into the landmark decision, legal principles, and supporting precedents. Note: This is general information based on judgments and not specific legal advice. Consult a qualified lawyer for your situation.
The aims to protect women from violence in domestic relationships, defined under as relationships between an and who are related by marriage, blood, or adoption, living together in a . However, courts have repeatedly held that doesn't extend to all relatives indiscriminately.
Key principles include:- Relatives must have a specific role or relationship to the or to be liable [
#DVActRuling, #HighCourtDV, #DomesticViolenceIndia
A combined reading of the above definitions reveals that an 'aggrieved person' is a woman, who is in a domestic relationship with the respondent and has been subjected to any act of domestic violence by the respondent. ... The Courts should be careful in proceeding against the distant relatives in crimes pertaining to matrimonial disputes and dowry deaths. The relatives of the husband should not be roped in on the basis of omnibus allegations unless specific instances....
The respondent has joined the petitioners in the domestic violence proceeding with the husband of the respondent and other relatives of the husband. It is seen that the specific allegations of ill-treatment/domestic violence have been made against nonapplicant nos.1 to 7. ... In order to proceed against the relatives on the basis of allegations and averments made in the application, the court must be satisfied that the case of #HL_S....
or singly by the respondent, including her stridhan or any other property held either jointly by the parties or separately by them without the leave of the Magistrate; ] [(f) causing violence to the dependants, other relatives or any person who give the aggrieved person assistance ... [(2) If the Magistrate is satisfied that an application prima facie discloses that the respondent is committing, or has committed an act of domestic violence or that there is a likeliho....
properly maintained and complainant despite violence and torture and domestic violence can be best illustrated by the ... PC, on record of trial Court, does not give a mention of any act of violence though learned Magistrate referred to it in the impugned order. ... any reference of children or any act of violence. ... There is no enquiry of finding with regard to any Act of Domestic Violence p style="position:absolute;white-space:pre;margin:....
The appellants/revisionists committed no domestic violence against the respondent no. 2. ... Respondent in a proceedings under the Domestic Violence Act can be any relative of the husband. ... Respondents being relatives of husband of respondent no. 2 cannot be held accountable for providing maintenance. ... In Section 2 which is definition clause, following expressions are defined as under: (a) “aggrieved person’ means any woman who is, or has been,....
He further submits that pursuant to respondent being subjected to domestic violence by the petitioner the application came to be filed by the respondent under the provisions of Domestic Violence Act. ... herein under Sections 12, 18, 19, 20, 22 and 23 of the Domestic Violence Act. ... The documents which are placed along with the application by the respondent in the proceedings initiated under the Domestic #HL_STAR....
While so, after moving to her parents house, she had instituted the Domestic Violence Case. On the date of filing of the Domestic Violence Case four years had lapsed. Therefore, the Domestic Violence Case is not maintainable on the point of limitation. ... The third Respondent/mother of the husband had examined herself as Respondent Witness-1. After due enquiry, the learned IX Metropolitan Magis....
In short, it is his case that applicant was not subjected to any domestic violence. He has made provision for her maintenance. On account of the grudge of her parents and her relatives against him, the present situation has been invited in their life. ... An act of domestic violence once committed, subsequent decree of divorce will not absolve the liability of the respondent from the offence committed or to deny the benefit to which the aggrieved person is entitled un....
In the latest judgment delivered by the Hon'ble Apex Court in case of K.Subb Rao and Others V/s. ... of the Domestic Violence Act, 2005. ... The Domestic Violence Act of 2005 therefore deals with violence within a Domestic Relationship. ... State of Telangana2 their lordships specifically observed that the relatives of the husband should not be roped in on the basis of vague allegation unless specific instances of their i....
In the latest judgment delivered by the Hon'ble Apex Court in case of K.Subb Rao and Others V/s. ... ... The Domestic Violence Act of 2005 therefore deals with violence within a Domestic Relationship. ... provisions of the Domestic Violence Act, 2005. ... State of Telangana, Criminal Appeal No.1045 of 2018 decided on 21.08.2018 their lordships specifically observed that the relatives of the husband should not be roped in on the bas....
(f) causing violence to the dependents, other relatives or any person who give the aggrieved person assistance from domestic violence; (g) committing any other act as specified in the protection order. (e) alienating any assets, operating bank lockers or bank accounts used or held or enjoyed by both the parties, jointly by the aggrieved person and the respondent or singly by the respondent, including her stridhan or any other property held either jointly by the parties or separately by them without the leave of the Magistrate;
He also developed an illicit relationship with the sister-in-law of one Madhu Chanda and wishes to marry her for which he used to pick up quarrel with the respondent and also used to torture her. She has also stated that she wishes to stay with the appellant, if he accepts her, and hence prayed for dismissal of the suit. So, the respondent filed a case of domestic violence against him.
B. Case No. 1371 of 2013 filed under Domestic Violence Act filed by the respondent-wife against the petitioner-husband pending before the Magistrate Court at Raipur, Chhatisgarh. C. Appeal filed against the decree of divorce filed by the respondent-wife pending before Family Court, Hamirpur, Utter Pradesh. Therefore, the following proceedings are quashed : A. Case No. 219 of 2014 filed by the respondent-wife against the petitioner-husband under Section 125 Cr.P.C. pending before the Family Court, Raipur, Chhatisgarh.
(f) causing violence to the dependants, other relatives or any person who give the aggrieved person assistance from domestic violence; (e) alienating any assets, operating bank lockers or bank accounts used or held or enjoyed by both the parties, jointly by the aggrieved person and the respondent or singly by the respondent, including her stridhan or any other property held either jointly by the parties or separately by them without the leave of the Magistrate; (g) committing any other act as specified in the protection order.
(f) causing violence to the dependants, other relatives or any person who give the aggrieved person assistance from domestic violence; 19. Residence orders.- (1) While disposing of an application under subsection (1) of Section 12, the Magistrate may, on being satisfied that domestic violence has taken place, pass a residence order- (e) alienating any assets, operating bank lockers or bank accounts used or held or enjoyed by both the parties, jointly by the aggrieved person and the respondent or singly by the respondent, including her stridhan or any other property held eit....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
